|
Comparative study of
nicorandil and a spasmolytic cocktail in preventing radial artery spasm
during transradial coronary angiography.
|
|
Authors |
Kim SH, Kim EJ, Cheon WS, Kim MK, Park WJ, Cho
GY, Choi YJ, Rhim CY. |
| Center |
Division of Cardiology,
Department of Internal Medicine, Hallym University Medical Center, 94-200,
Yeongdeungpo-dong, Yeongdeungpo-gu, 150-030, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
cardioguy@korea.ac.kr |
| Journal |
Int J Cardiol. 2007 Sep 3;120(3):325-30
|
| Shortened abstract |
BACKGROUND: Radial artery spasm is one of
the most common complications during coronary angiography via the
transradial approach, causing patient discomfort or sometimes interrupting
the procedure. This study was designed to compare the spasmolytic effect
between nicorandil and a cocktail during transradial coronary angiography.
METHODS: A randomized study to compare 4 mg of nicorandil and a cocktail
(mixture of normal saline, 200 microg of verapamil) was performed in 150
patients. We examined vasospasms of the radial artery that were expressed as
stenosis of the radial artery vessel diameter after the procedure. RESULT:
The reductions of systolic and diastolic blood pressures showed no
significant differences between the two groups (15.4+/-11.5/7.7+/-7.8 mmHg
for nicorandil and 16.3+/-13.4/6.2 mmHg for cocktail). Both agents induced a
significant radial artery vasodilation after transradial administration at
proximal and mid segments (P < 0.001 for all). Nicorandil showed a
significant increase of the mean change of the radial artery diameter
compared to the cocktail at mid-segment (0.32+/-0.23 mm for nicorandil and
0.24+/-0.15 mm for a cocktail, P < 0.05). There was no statistically
significant difference between the two groups in radial artery spasm (50.7%
vs. 52.0% in nicorandil and a cocktail, respectively) after catheterization.
CONCLUSION: Nicorandil with vasodilator effects by a dual mechanism was
effective as the cocktail in preventing radial artery spasm during
transradial coronary angiography.
|
|
Transradial approach for
carotid artery stenting: a feasibility study.
|
|
Authors |
Folmar J, Sachar R, Mann T. |
| Center |
Wake Heart and Vascular
Associates, Wake Heart Center, 3000 New Bern Avenue, Raleigh, NC 27610, USA. |
| Journal |
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2007 Feb
15;69(3):355-61
|
| Shortened abstract |
BACKGROUND: Carotid artery stenting (CAS)
has become accepted as an alternative to carotid endarterectomy for
revascularization of the internal carotid artery (ICA) among high risk
patients. CAS from the femoral approach can be problematic due to access
site complications as well as technical difficulties related to peripheral
vascular disease (PVD) and/or anatomical variations of the aortic arch. The
purpose of the present study is to evaluate the feasibility of the radial
artery as an alternative approach for CAS. METHODS: Forty-two patients (mean
age 71 +/- 1, 26 male) underwent CAS. All had a CA stenosis greater than 80%
and comorbid conditions increasing the risk of carotid endarterectomy. The
target common carotid artery (CCA) was initially cannulated via the radial
artery using a 5F Simmons 1 diagnostic catheter which was then advanced to
the external CA (ECA) over an extra support 0.014" coronary guidewire. After
removing the coronary guidewire, a 0.035" guidewire was advanced into the
ECA, and the Simmons 1 was exchanged for a 5F or 6F shuttle sheath and
positioned in the distal CCA. In four patients with a bovine aortic arch,
the left CCA was accessed with a 5F Amplatz R2 catheter which was then
exchanged for a shuttle sheath over a 0.035" guidewire. CAS was performed
using standard techniques with weight-based bivalirudin for anticoagulation.
RESULTS: CAS was successful in 35/42 (83%) patients, including 28/29 (97%)
right CA, 4/5 (80%) bovine left CA, 7/13 (54%) left CA. Mean interventional
time was 30 +/- 3 minutes. The sheath was removed immediately after the
procedure. There were no radial access site complications. One patient
sustained a stroke 24 hrs after the procedure with complete resolution of
symptoms (Mean NIH stroke scale 2.0 +/- 0.3 before, 1.9 +/- 0.3 after).
Median hospital stay was 2 +/- 0.6 days. Inadequate catheter support at the
origin of the CCA was the technical cause of failure in the seven
unsuccessful cases. CONCLUSION: CAS using the transradial approach appears
to be safe and technically feasible. The technique may be particularly
useful in patients with right ICA lesions and severe PVD or unfavorable arch
anatomy, and among patients with a bovine aortic arch.
|
|
Overview of the transradial
approach in percutaneous coronary intervention.
|
|
Authors |
Amoroso G, Laarman GJ, Kiemeneij F. |
| Center |
Department of
Interventional Cardiology, Onze Lieve Vrouwe Gasthuis, Amsterdam, The
Netherlands. G.Amoroso@olvg.nl |
| Journal |
J Cardiovasc Med (Hagerstown). 2007
Apr;8(4):230-7.
|
| Shortened abstract |
Thirteen years have passed since the first
percutaneous coronary intervention was performed at Onze Lieve Vrouwe
Gasthuis in Amsterdam using the transradial approach (TRA). Since then TRA
has spread through the interventional community and many centres have now
adopted TRA as the arterial access of choice. This review is focused on the
hot issues and the latest developments in this field. The following subjects
will be addressed and discussed: drawbacks and learning curve, procedural
technique, indications (with particular attention to acute coronary
patients), complications, contraindications, nurse workload, patient
management, and economics.
|
|
Comparison of immediate and
followup results between transradial and transfemoral approach for
percutaneous coronary intervention in true bifurcational lesions.
|
|
Authors |
Yang YJ, Xu B, Chen JL, Kang S, Qiao SB, Qin XW,
Yao M, Chen J, Wu YJ, Liu HB, Yuan JQ, You SJ, Li JJ, Dai J, Gao RL. |
| Center |
Centre for Coronary
Artery Disease, Department of Cardiology, Cardiovascular Institute and Fuwai
Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical
College, Beijing 100037, China. yyj58@yahoo.com |
| Journal |
Chin Med J (Engl). 2007 Apr 5;120(7):539-44.
|
| Shortened abstract |
BACKGROUND: A comparison of efficacy and
safety between transradial and transfemoral approach for percutaneous
coronary intervention (PCI) in bifurcations has not been done. This study
evaluated feasibility of transradial PCI (TRI) and compared the immediate
and followup results with transfemoral PCI (TFI) in bifurcations. METHODS:
One hundred and thirty-four consecutive patients with bifurcations were
treated with PCI in our hospital from April 2004 to October 2005. Of these,
there were 60 patients (88 lesions) in TRI group and 74 patients (101
lesions) in TFI group. Bifurcations type was classified according to the
Institut Cardiovasculaire Paris Sud Classification. RESULTS: TRI group had
smaller stent diameter ((3.06 +/- 0.37) mm vs (3.18 +/- 0.35) mm, P = 0.023)
and postprocedural in-stent minimum lumen diameter ((2.62 +/- 0.37) mm vs
(2.74 +/- 0.41) mm, P = 0.029) than TFI, but there were not significant
differences in in-stent subacute thrombosis rate (0% vs 1.0%, P = 0.349),
target lesion revascularization (TLR) (0% vs 1.0%, P = 0.349) following
procedure and thrombosis (2.3% vs 1.0%, P = 0.482), in-stent restenosis
(12.5% vs 10.9%, P = 0.731), in-segment restenosis (17.0% vs 14.9%, P =
0.681), TLR (10.2% vs 13.9%, P = 0.446) and TLR-free cumulative survival
rate (89.8% vs 86.1%, P = 0.787) at seven months followup. No death was
reported in the two groups. CONCLUSION: Transradial intervention is feasible
and appears to be as effective and safe as transfemoral PCI in treatment of
true bifurcational lesions.
|
|
Risk of acute brain injury
related to cerebral microembolism during cardiac catheterization performed
by right upper limb arterial access.
|
|
Authors |
Hamon M, Gomes S, Clergeau MR, Fradin S, Morello
R |
| Center |
|
| Journal |
Stroke. 2007 Jul;38(7):2176-9. Epub 2007 May
24.
|
| Shortened abstract |
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: The primary
objective of this study was to assess the incidence of new cerebral infarcts
related to cardiac catheterization in patients explored through the right
transradial approach. METHODS: This prospective study involved 41
consecutive patients with severe aortic valve stenosis. To assess the
incidence of cerebral infarction, all patients underwent cerebral
diffusion-weighted MRI before and after cardiac catheterization through the
right transradial approach. RESULTS: We detected only two patients (4.9%)
with new, small, isolated acute cerebral diffusion abnormalities
postcatheterization. All patients remained asymptomatic. CONCLUSIONS: New
cerebral lesions on diffusion-weighted MRI are infrequent in patients
explored through the right transradial approach. Randomized studies are
warranted to confirm for potential advantages of transradial approach versus
the femoral approach in cardiac catheterization
|
|
Feasibility and safety of
transradial stenting for unprotected left main coronary artery stenoses.
|
|
Authors |
Cheng CI, Wu CJ, Fang CY, Youssef AA, Chen CJ,
Chen SM, Yang CH, Hsueh SK, Yip HK, Chen MC, Fu M, Hsieh YK. |
| Center |
Graduate Institute of
Clinical Medical Sciences, Chang Gung University College of Medicine, Chang
Gung Memorial Hospital-Kaohsiung Medical Center, No.123 Ta-Pei Road, Niao-Sung
Township, Kaohsiung County, 83301 Taiwan, ROC. |
| Journal |
Circ J. 2007 Jun;71(6):855-61.
|
| Shortened abstract |
BACKGROUND: Percutaneous coronary
intervention (PCI) is considered an excellent alternative treatment for
unprotected left main coronary artery (ULMCA) stenoses. Most PCIs for ULMCA
stenoses are performed via the transfemoral approach. The feasibility and
safety of the transradial approach for this particular entity are unknown.
The present study assessed the feasibility, safety and 1-year outcomes of
the transradial approach for stenting of ULMCA stenoses. METHODS AND
RESULTS: Of 131 consecutive patients who underwent coronary stenting for
ULMCA stenoses, 113 patients (86.3%) received stenting using the transradial
approach. All 113 procedures were performed with 6 or 7 French (Fr)
catheters except 1 procedure requiring an 8 Fr guiding catheter for
directional atherectomy. The technical success rate was 100%, and
angiographic success was achieved in 96 patients (85.9%). Two patients had
local hematoma (1.8%), and no procedure-related deaths, Q-wave myocardial
infarction, repetitive PCI, stroke or emergent coronary artery bypass graft
surgery during hospitalization were noted. One (0.9%) in-hospital cardiac
death occurred due to ventricular tachyarrhythmia. More than half of our
patients stayed in hospital by < or =3 days. The 1-year target lesion
revascularization and cardiac death rate were 14.2% and 3.5%, respectively.
CONCLUSIONS: This investigation demonstrated the feasibility, safety and
accepted short-term clinical outcomes of transradial stenting for ULMCA
stenosis. This procedure may offer a feasible alternative to the
transfemoral approach.
|
|
Transradial access in a
cath lab with moderate procedural volume: a single operator's experience.
|
|
Authors |
Rigattieri S, Ferraiuolo G, Loschiavo P. |
| Center |
Cardiology Department,
Sandro Pertini Hospital, Rome, Italy. stefanorigattieri@yahoo.it |
| Journal |
Minerva Cardioangiol. 2007
Jun;55(3):303-9
|
| Shortened abstract |
AIM: The transradial access (TRA) for
cardiovascular interventions has become increasingly popular and was shown
to be effective in many clinical settings, including acute coronary
syndromes. Despite offering many advantages, such as a striking reduction in
access site complications, the penetration of TRA in routine practice is
still low. One reason for this could be that many studies about TRA were
performed in high-volume centers by expert operators, making their results
not fully applicable to the real world. In order to assess the efficacy of
TRA, we retrospectively reviewed the caseload of a single operator working
in a community hospital with moderate procedural volume. METHODS: We
considered 873 consecutive procedures, of which 406 percutaneous coronary
interventions (PCI), performed by a single operator (S.R.) who had
previously completed the learning curve in TRA at a high volume center.
RESULTS: TRA was selected in 48.3% of patients, transfemoral approach (TFA)
in 50.9% and transbrachial approach in 0.8%. TFA was used more frequently in
PCI (62.5% vs 37.5%; P<0.001), largely because it was the access of choice
in primary PCI. The overall procedural success rate was 94% in TRA and 98%
in TFA (P=0.035); access failure was more frequent in TRA (5.9% vs 1.1%;
P<0.001), whereas an increased rate of access-related vascular complications
was observed in TFA as compared to TRA (1.1% vs 0%; P=0.029). CONCLUSION:
After an adequate training period, the overall performance of TRA is good
even in moderate-volume hospitals. Despite reducing access site
complications, TRA is limited by a slightly higher rate of procedural
failure as compared to TFA.
|
|
Reduced vascular
complications and length of stay with transradial rescue angioplasty for
acute myocardial infarction.
|
|
Authors |
Cruden NL, Teh CH, Starkey IR, Newby DE. |
| Center |
Centre for Cardiovascular
Science, University of Edinburgh, Royal Infirmary of Edinburgh, Edinburgh,
United Kingdom. |
| Journal |
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2007 Jun
11
|
| Shortened abstract |
OBJECTIVES:: The aim of this study was to
compare clinical outcomes for transradial and transfemoral percutaneous
coronary intervention in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial
infarction undergoing rescue angioplasty. BACKGROUND:: Transfemoral
percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with acute myocardial
infarction treated with systemic thrombolysis is associated with a
significant risk of vascular complications. A transradial approach may
reduce vascular complications, improve mobilization and facilitate earlier
discharge. METHODS:: In a retrospective analysis, clinical outcomes for 287
consecutive patients undergoing rescue angioplasty for acute myocardial
infarction were determined. Data were recorded using a standardized proforma
and analyzed using SPSS. RESULTS:: Procedural success was similar for the
transradial and transfemoral routes (98% vs. 93%; P = 0.3). There was a
reduction in vascular complications (0 (0%) vs. 32 (13%); P < 0.01) and
post-procedural length of stay (7.0 +/- 7.9 vs. 7.9 +/- 5.6 days; P < 0.005)
in the radial group when compared with the femoral group. There were no
differences in procedural or in-hospital mortality, procedure duration, or
radiation dose between the two groups. CONCLUSION:: Rescue angioplasty
performed via the radial artery is safe, effective, and associated with a
reduction in vascular complications and length of hospital stay when
compared with the femoral approach. These findings suggest that where
facilities and experience allow rescue angioplasty in patients with acute
myocardial infarction should be performed via the radial artery.
|
|
Feasibility and Safety of
Transradial Arterial Approach for Simultaneous Right and Left Vertebral
Artery Angiographic Studies and Stenting.
|
|
Authors |
Yip HK, Youssef AA, Chang WN, Lu CH, Yang CH,
Chen SM, Wu CJ. |
| Center |
Division of Cardiology,
Chang Gung Memorial Hospital- Kaohsiung Medical Center, Chang Gung
University Collage of Medicine, Kaohsiung, Taiwan, R.O.C. |
| Journal |
Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 2007 Jun
22;
|
| Shortened abstract |
OBJECTIVES: This study investigated whether
the transradial artery (TRA) approach using a 6-French (F) Kimny guiding
catheter for right vertebral artery (VA) angiographic study and stenting is
safe and effective for patients with significant VA stenosis. BACKGROUND:
The TRA approach is commonly performed worldwide for both diagnostic cardiac
catheterization and catheter-based coronary intervention. However, to our
knowledge, the safety and feasibility of left and right VA angiographic
study and stenting, in the same procedure, using the TRA approach for
patients with brain ischemia have not been reported. METHODS: The study
included 24 consecutive patients (22 male,2 female; age, 63-78 years).
Indications for VA angiographic study and stenting were (1) prior stroke or
symptoms related to vertebrobasilar ischemia and (2) an asymptomatic but
vertebral angiographic finding of severe stenosis (>70%). A combination of
the ipsilateral and retrograde-engagement technique, which involved a
looping 6-F Kimny guiding catheter, was utilized for VA angiographic study.
For VA stenting, an ipsilateral TRA approach with either a Kimny guiding
catheter or a left internal mammary artery guiding catheter was utilized in
22 patients and retrograde-engagement technique in 2 patients. RESULTS: A
technically successful procedure was achieved in all patients, including
left VA stenting in 15 patients and right VA stenting in 9 patients. The
mean time for stenting (from engagement to stent deployment) was 12.7 min.
There were no vascular complications or mortality. However, one patient
suffered from a transient ischemic attack that resolved within 3 h.
CONCLUSION: We conclude that TRA access for both VA angiographic study and
VA stenting is safe and effective, and provides a simple and useful clinical
tool for patients unsuited for femoral arterial access.
|
|
Transradial approach for
noncoronary angiography and interventions.
|
|
Authors |
Yamashita T, Imai S, Tamada T, Yamamoto A,
Egashira N, Watanabe S, Higashi H, Gyoten M. |
| Center |
Department of Diagnostic
Radiology, Kawasaki Medical School, Okayama, Japan. takenori@med.kawasaki-m.ac.jp |
| Journal |
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2007 Aug
1;70(2):303-8.
|
| Shortened abstract |
PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was
to retrospectively evaluate the feasibility and safety of a transradial
approach for non-coronary angiography and interventions. BACKGROUND:
Generally, the transradial approach is used for coronary angiography and
intervention around the world, and experiences have been widely reported.
However, few large studies have examined the transradial approach for
vessels other than the coronary or cerebral artery. METHODS: Subjects
comprised 329 patients who underwent a total of 400 procedures (285
abdomens, 68 pelvises, and 47 lower limbs) with transradial angiography and
interventions between January 1999 and June 2006. Normal Allen test results
were confirmed before all procedures. A 130- or 150-cm long 4F catheter
modified to our own design was used for angiography and interventions such
as transarterial embolization or transarterial chemotherapy. RESULTS: Radial
artery access was unachievable in 19 of the 400 procedures (4.8%). The
radial artery was injured during 1 procedure (0.2%). In the remaining 380
procedures, sufficient angiography was obtained to grasp the condition of
indispensable vessels for diagnosis and interventions scheduled in advance
succeeded. Total transradial technical success rate in the series was 95%.
Frequency of complications such as radial injury or radial spasm was 1.8%.
No cases of local hematoma, hand ischemia, or cerebral infarction were
encountered. CONCLUSION: The transradial approach was useful for
non-coronary angiography and interventions and offers the advantages of low
risk and reduced stress on patients.
|
|
Interruption of blood flow during compression and radial artery occlusion
after transradial catheterization.
|
|
Authors |
Sanmartin M, Gomez M, Rumoroso JR, Sadaba M,
Martinez M, Baz JA, Iniguez A. |
| Center |
Unidad de Cardiologia
Intervencionista, Medtec, Hospital Meixoeiro, Vigo, Spain. |
| Journal |
Cathet Cardiovasc Interv
2007 Jan 3
|
| Shortened abstract |
Objectives: To analyze the possible
relationship between compression after transradial catheterization and
radial artery occlusion. Background: Radial artery occlusion is an important
concern of transradial catheterization. Interruption of radial artery flow
during compression might influence the rate of radial artery occlusion at
follow-up. Methods: A prospective study including 275 consecutive patients
undergoing transradial catheterization was conducted. Arterial sheaths were
removed immediately after procedures and conventional compressive dressings
were left in place for 2 hr. The pulse oximeter signal in the index finger
during ipsilateral ulnar compression was used for the assessment of radial
artery flow. Results: Radial artery flow was absent in 174 cases (62%)
immediately after entry-site compression. After 2 hr of conventional
hemostasis, radial artery flow was absent in 162 cases (58%) before bandage
removal. At 7-day follow-up, 12 patients (4.4%) had absent pulsations and
radial artery flow was absent in 29 cases (10.5%). Patients with an occluded
radial artery at follow-up had significantly smaller arterial diameters at
baseline (2.23 +/- 0.4 mm vs. 2.40 +/- 0.5 mm; P = 0.032) and more
frequently had absent flow during hemostasis (90% vs. 54%, P < 0.001).
Stepwise logistic regression analysis revealed that absent flow before
compressive bandages removal was the only independent predictor of radial
artery occlusion at follow-up (OR = 6.7; IC 95%: 1.95-22.9; P = 0.002).
Conclusions: Flow-limiting compression is a frequent finding during
conventional hemostasis after transradial catheterization. Absence of radial
artery flow during compression represents a strong predictor of radial
artery occlusion.
|
|
Transradial approach for
carotid artery stenting: A feasibility study.
|
|
Authors |
Folmar J, Sachar R, Mann T |
| Center |
Wake Heart and Vascular
Associates, Wake Heart Center, Raleigh, North Carolina. |
| Journal |
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv.
2007 Jan 17;69(3):355-361
|
| Shortened abstract |
Background: Carotid artery stenting (CAS)
has become accepted as an alternative to carotid endarterectomy for
revascularization of the internal carotid artery (ICA) among high risk
patients. CAS from the femoral approach can be problematic due to access
site complications as well as technical difficulties related to peripheral
vascular disease (PVD) and/or anatomical variations of the aortic arch. The
purpose of the present study is to evaluate the feasibility of the radial
artery as an alternative approach for CAS. Methods: Forty-two patients (mean
age 71 +/- 1, 26 male) underwent CAS. All had a CA stenosis greater than 80%
and comorbid conditions increasing the risk of carotid endarterectomy. The
target common carotid artery (CCA) was initially cannulated via the radial
artery using a 5F Simmons 1 diagnostic catheter which was then advanced to
the external CA (ECA) over an extrasupport 0.014" coronary guidewire. After
removing the coronary guidewire, a 0.035" guidewire was advanced into the
ECA, and the Simmons 1 was exchanged for a 5F or 6F shuttle sheath and
positioned in the distal CCA. In four patients with a bovine aortic arch,
the left CCA was accessed with a 5F Amplatz R2 catheter which was then
exchanged for a shuttle sheath over a 0.035" guidewire. CAS was performed
using standard techniques with weight-based bivalirudin for anticoagulation.
Results: CAS was successful in 35/42 (83%) patients, including 28/29 (97%)
right CA, 4/5 (80%) bovine left CA, 7/13 (54%) left CA. Mean interventional
time was 30 +/- 3 minutes. The sheath was removed immediately after the
procedure. There were no radial access site complications. One patient
sustained a stroke 24 hrs after the procedure with complete resolution of
symptoms (Mean NIH stroke scale 2.0 +/- 0.3 before, 1.9 +/- 0.3 after).
Median hospital stay was 2 +/- 0.6 days. Inadequate catheter support at the
origin of the CCA was the technical cause of failure in the seven
unsuccessful cases. Conclusion: CAS using the transradial approach appears
to be safe and technically feasible. The technique may be particularly
useful in patients with right ICA lesions and severe PVD or unfavorable arch
anatomy, and among patients with a bovine aortic arch.
|
|
The effect of a eutectic
mixture of local anesthetic cream on wrist pain during transradial
coronary procedures.
|
|
Authors |
Kim JY, Yoon J, Yoo BS, Lee SH, Choe KH. |
| Center |
Wonju College of Medicine,
Yonsei University, Wonju, Kangwon Province, South Korea |
| Journal |
J Invasive Cardiol. 2007
Jan;19(1):6-9.
|
| Shortened abstract |
OBJECTIVE: We sought to
evaluate the effects and optimal application time of a eutectic mixture of
local anesthetic cream (EMLA-C) in relieving wrist pain during transradial
coronary procedures (TRCP). METHODS: The Phase I study enrolled 147 patients
to evaluate the efficacy and safety of the EMLA-C during TRCP. The Phase II
study was designed to evaluate the optimal preprocedure application time
frame of EMLA-C for wrist pain reduction in 400 patients. The EMLA or
placebo cream was applied at the puncture site from 2 to 4 hours before the
procedure in Phase I, and randomized to 5 time groups according to the time
of drug application in Phase II. We evaluated wrist pain by the visual
analogue scale (VAS) or verbal rating scale (VRS-4), and evaluated
complications as well. RESULTS: EMLA-C demonstrated greater pain relief by
VAS (control: 49+/-24, EMLA: 19+/-22; p = 0.001) and VRS-4 (control:
2.3+/-0.5, EMLA: 1.5+/-0.6; p = 0.001), and there was a negative correlation
(r = -0.476; p = 0.001) between VAS and the preprocedure application time of
EMLA-C. In Phase II, there was a significant difference in pain levels
between the control and 1- to 2-hour groups by VAS (control: 49+/-29,
EMLA1-2 hours: 32+/-24; p = 0.001) and VRS-4 (control: 2.4+/-0.6, EMLA1-2
hours: 1.9+/-0.6; p = 0.001). Drug-induced local erythema frequently
occurred in the 3- to 4-hour group (6.6%) and >4 hours group (11.9%).
CONCLUSIONS: EMLA-C can be effective in reducing wrist pain during TRCP
without any significant drug-related complications when the application time
is 1 to 3 hours before the procedure. |
|
Percutaneous treatment of
dysfunctional Brescia-Cimino fistulae through a radial arterial approach.
|
|
Authors |
Wang HJ, Yang YF. |
| Center |
Department of Internal
Medicine, Division of Cardiology, China Medical University Hospital,
Taichung, Taiwan. joe5977@ms32.hinet.net |
| Journal |
Am J Kidney Dis. 2006
Oct;48(4):652-8
|
| Shortened abstract |
BACKGROUND: Dysfunctional
Brescia-Cimino fistulae contribute to significant morbidity in hemodialysis
patients. These fistulae normally are treated through a retrograde venous
approach. There are no data regarding a transradial approach. Furthermore,
measurement of pressure reduction in the radial artery appears to be useful.
METHODS: We retrospectively examined 50 interventions to treat 49 patients
(17 men, 32 women; mean age, 61.8 +/- 10.6 years) with Brescia-Cimino
fistulae. Inclusion criteria were patients with palpable radial arteries and
dysfunctional end-to-side Brescia-Cimino fistulae. Patients with infected
fistulae, contrast allergy, upper-arm/synthetic graft/central-vein stenosis,
and end-to-end Brescia-Cimino fistulae were excluded from the study. Radial
arterial pressures before and after angioplasty were compared as a surrogate
of stenosis relief. Anatomic and clinical success rates were calculated.
RESULTS: Sixty-five stenoses and 4 total occlusions were treated through
radial access. All radial punctures were successful, except in 1 patient.
Most lesions were located in the cephalic vein (87%). Mean length of treated
lesions was 4.1 +/- 2.8 cm. Mean pretreatment diameter of lesion stenoses
was 76.7% +/- 12.1%. Mean posttreatment diameter stenosis was 22.6% +/- 8.2%
(P < 0.001). Systolic, diastolic, and mean blood pressures recorded from the
radial artery decreased from 130 +/- 40, 60 +/- 18, and 87 +/- 27 to 88 +/-
40, 43 +/- 18, and 60 +/- 26 mm Hg (P < 0.001, P < 0.001, and P < 0.001),
respectively. The anatomic success rate of the transradial approach was
91.3%. The clinical success rate of the transradial approach was 96%.
CONCLUSION: The transradial approach is a feasible and highly effective
approach to treat dysfunctional Brescia-Cimino fistulae. Measuring blood
pressure reduction through the radial artery appears promising as a
hemodynamic evaluation method. |
|
Hours during and after
coronary intervention and angiography.
|
|
Authors |
Lunden MH, Bengtson A, Lundgren SM. |
| Center |
Sahlgrenska Academy at
Goteborg University, Goteborg, Sweden. |
| Journal |
Clin Nurs Res. 2006
Nov;15(4):274-89
|
| Shortened abstract |
The purpose of this study
was to describe patients' experience during and after coronary angiography
and percutaneous coronary intervention. Data were collected by interviews
with 14 patients. A qualitative content analysis approach was used. Four
main categories were identified that describe patients' experience of the
hours during and following intervention: emotional thoughts, bodily
sensations, nursing intervention of importance, and personal strategies. All
patients made a comment on staff conduct and pointed out that even minor
nursing actions may be of great importance. Patients were most positive
toward the transradial approach. Even though the approach via arteria
radialis will increase, many patients will still have their procedure done
via arteria femoralis. In spite of all research and technical developments,
the patients' experience from intervention via arteria femoralis is pretty
much the same as it was 1997. |
|
The feasibility of
percutaneous transradial coronary intervention for chronic total
occlusion.
|
|
Authors |
Kim JY, Lee SH, Choe HM, Yoo BS, Yoon J, Choe KH. |
| Center |
Division of Cardiology,
Yonsei University, Wonju College of Medicine, 162 Ilsan-dong, Wonju 220-701,
Korea. |
| Journal |
Yonsei Med J. 2006 Oct
31;47(5):680-7.
|
| Shortened abstract |
We evaluated the feasibility
of the transradial coronary intervention (TRCI) in 85 consecutive patients
with chronic total occlusion (CTO). Clinical, angiographic and procedural
factors were compared between the success and failure groups. An overall
success rate of 65.5% (57 of 87 lesions) was achieved with TRCI, and the
most common cause of failure was an inability to pass the lesion with a
guidewire. A multivariate analysis demonstrated that the most significant
predictor of failure was the duration of occlusion (OR 1.064 per month, 95%
CI 1.005 to 1.126, p = 0.03). The procedural success rate improved with use
of new-generation hydrophilic guidewires. The 6 Fr guiding catheters were
used in the majority of the 70 cases (81%). Five cases were crossed over to
a femoral artery approach due to engagement failure of the guiding catheter
into the coronary ostium because of severe subclavian tortuosity and
stenosis in two cases, radial artery looping in one case, and poor guiding
support in two cases. There were no major entry site complications. In
conclusion, the radial artery might be a feasible vascular route in coronary
interventions for CTO, with comparable procedural success and no access site
complications |
|
[Psychologic status
comparison in patients treated with transradial or transfermoral approach
coronary catheterizations]
|
|
Authors |
Chen Y, Qiu YG, Zhu JH, Zheng P, Chen JZ, Zhang
FR, Zhao LL, Tao QM, Zheng LR |
| Center |
Department of Cardiology,
First Affiliated Hospital, College of Medicine, Zhejiang University,
Hangzhou 310003, China. |
| Journal |
Zhonghua Xin Xue Guan Bing Za Zhi. 2006
Aug;34(8):714-7.
|
| Shortened abstract |
OBJECTIVE: We previously
showed that factorial score of somatization, which was obtained by the
examination of symptom checklist-90 (SCL-90), was higher in patients
received transfemoral coronary catheterization than norm. The aim of the
present study was to compare the patient's psychologic status between
transradial approach and transfemoral approach percutaneous coronary
catheterizations. METHODS: A total of 198 inpatients (105 transfemoral, 93
transradial) underwent scheduled first time coronary catheterizations were
enrolled. All patients were studied by symptom SCL-90 on present psychologic
status 24 hours before and 24-48 hours after coronary catheterizations.
RESULTS: Age, sex, weight, smokers, employment, educational background,
marriage status, family relations, family history of cardiovascular disease,
income and medical insurance status were similar between the two groups.
There was also no difference in diabetes, hypertension history as well as
coronary heart disease confirmed by coronary catheterization between the 2
groups. Compared with the status before the procedure, factorial scores of
somatization, obsessive-compulsive, interpersonal sensitivity, depression,
anxiety, hostility, global severity index and total positive symptoms were
significantly reduced after percutaneous coronary catheterizations (1.50 +/-
0.51 vs. 1.64 +/- 0.53, 1.50 +/- 0.48 vs. 1.67 +/- 0.55, 1.28 +/- 0.41 vs.
1.38 +/- 0.49, 1.42 +/- 0.43 vs. 1.55 +/- 0.53, 1.38 +/- 0.41 vs. 1.58 +/-
0.54, 1.32 +/- 0.35 vs. 1.44 +/- 0.41, 1.38 +/- 0.34 vs. 1.49 +/- 0.42, and
23.08 +/- 17.30 vs. 27.72 +/- 18.79, respectively, P all < 0.05). Scores on
somatization, depression and positive symptom severity index were
significantly lower in patients received transradial coronary
catheterizations than those received transfermoral coronary catheterization
approach (1.52 +/- 0.51 vs. 1.62 +/- 0.53, 1.43 +/- 0.54 vs. 1.54 +/- 0.43
and 2.36 +/- 0.66 vs. 2.50 +/- 0.43, respectively, P all < 0.05).
CONCLUSION: Patients' psychologic status improved significantly after
percutaneous coronary catheterizations. Improvement on psychologic status is
significantly better in patients underwent transradial coronary
catheterizations than that underwent transfemoral coronary catheterizations. |
|
Repeat right transradial
percutaneous coronary intervention in a patient with dextrocardia: The
right approach to the right-sided heart.
|
|
Authors |
Chen JP |
| Center |
|
| Journal |
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2006 Dec 26
|
| Shortened abstract |
Dextrocardia (DC) is a rare
cardiac condition in which the cardiac location, as well as apex, is
rightwardly displaced. As the incidence of atherosclerotic disease is
similar to that of the general population, there have been few reports of
percutaneous coronary interventions (PCIs) in these patients. Proposed
technical strategies for successful angiography and PCI in DC include
counter-directional torquing of the catheter, as well as right-left
mirror-image inversion angiographic views. All previous reports of DC PCIs
have been via transfemoral access.We present a case of successful repeat
transradial PCI in a patient with DC. This is first report of transradial
coronary angiography, PCI, or repeat PCI in a DC patient. A literature
review of technical considerations, including our own recommendations for
guide catheter selection, are discussed. We also review the anatomic
variations and epidemiology of DC. Although access complications for
transradial PCI is known to be lower than that of the transfemoral approach,
challenges in technique and concern of repeat access have limited the
popularity of the former. Our report demonstrates the safety and feasibility
of transradial angiography, PCI, and even repeat PCI, in the rare patient
with DC. (c) 2006 Wiley-Liss, Inc. |
|
A randomized study
comparing same-day home discharge and abciximab bolus only to overnight
hospitalization and abciximab bolus and infusion after transradial
coronary stent implantation.
|
|
Authors |
Bertrand OF, De Larochelliere R, Rodes-Cabau J,
Proulx G, Gleeton O, Nguyen CM, Dery JP, Barbeau G, Noel B, Larose E,
Poirier P, Roy L; Early Discharge After Transradial Stenting of Coronary
Arteries Study Investigators. |
| Center |
Hopital Laval, Institut
Universitaire de Cardiologie et de Pneumologie, affilie a l'Universite Laval,
2725 Chemin Ste Foy, Quebec, Canada G1V 4G5. Olivier.Bertrand@crhl.ulaval.ca |
| Journal |
Circulation. 2006 Dec 12;114(24):2636-43
|
| Shortened abstract |
BACKGROUND: Systematic use
of coronary stents and optimized platelet aggregation inhibition has greatly
improved the short-term results of percutaneous coronary interventions.
Transradial percutaneous coronary interventions have been associated with a
low risk of bleeding complications. It is unknown whether moderate- and
high-risk patients can be discharged safely the same day after uncomplicated
transradial percutaneous coronary interventions. METHODS AND RESULTS: We
randomized 1005 patients after a bolus of abciximab and uncomplicated
transradial percutaneous coronary stent implantation either to same-day home
discharge and no infusion of abciximab (group 1, n=504) or to overnight
hospitalization and a standard 12-hour infusion of abciximab (group 2,
n=501). The primary composite end point of the study was the 30-day
incidence of any of the following events: death, myocardial infarction,
urgent revascularization, major bleeding, repeat hospitalization, access
site complications, and severe thrombocytopenia. The noninferiority of
same-day home discharge and bolus of abciximab only compared with overnight
hospitalization and abciximab bolus and infusion was evaluated. Two thirds
of patients presented with unstable angina and approximately 20% presented
with high-risk acute coronary syndrome prior to the procedure. The incidence
of the primary end point was 20.4% in group 1 and 18.2% in group 2 (P=0.017
for noninferiority) with a troponin T-based definition of myocardial
infarction; the incidence of the primary end point was 11.1% in group 1 and
9.6% in group 2 (P=0.0004 for noninferiority) with a creatinine kinase
myocardial band-based definition of myocardial infarction. No death occurred.
Rate of major bleeding in both groups was extremely low at 0.8% and 0.2%,
respectively. From 504 patients randomized in group 1, 88% were discharged
home the same day. CONCLUSIONS: Our data suggest that same-day home
discharge after uncomplicated transradial coronary stenting and bolus only
of abciximab is not clinically inferior, in a wide spectrum of patients, to
the standard overnight hospitalization and a bolus followed by a 12-hour
infusion. This novel approach offers a safe strategy for same-day home
discharge after uncomplicated coronary intervention. |
|
An experience on radial
versus femoral approach for diagnostic coronary angiography in Turkey.
|
|
Authors |
Yigit F, Sezgin AT, Erol T, Demircan S, Tekin G,
Katircibasi T, Tekin A, Muderrisoglu H. |
| Center |
Department of Cardiology,
Baskent University School of Medicine, Ankara, Turkey. yigitfatma2000@yahoo.com |
| Journal |
Anadolu Kardiyol Derg. 2006 Sep;6(3):229-34.
|
| Shortened abstract |
OBJECTIVE: The radial
approach has been increasingly used as an alternative to femoral access. The
purpose of the present study was to assess the feasibility, success, and
safety of the transradial approach (TRA) for diagnostic coronary angiography,
and to describe the difficulties associated with the technique as compared
with transfemoral approach (TRF). METHODS: A series of 180 consecutive
patients were divided to TRA or TFA groups by two operators. We compared the
groups regarding procedural time, access time, fluoroscopy time, procedural
failure, complications, contrast volume, length of hospital stay, and number
of used coronary catheters. RESULTS: The number of used coronary catheters
was not different between the two groups (p = 0.6). Total hospital length of
stay was significantly shorter in the radial group (p <0.0001) than in
femoral one. We found differences between the radial and femoral groups in
the success rate (p<0.0001), contrast volume (p = 0.012), procedural time
(p<0.0001), access time (p<0.0001), and fluoroscopy time (p<0.0001). We did
not find any major complication in the radial group. There was a major
bleeding in the femoral group. CONCLUSION: The TRA is a safe alternative to
femoral catheterization although with lesser procedural success, longer
procedural access, and radiation time, and more contrast volume. |
|
Coronary angiography and
angioplasty using the aberrant radial artery as an access site.
|
|
Authors |
Abhaichand RK, Sambasivam KA, Vydianathan PR,
Raveendran P, Saigopalan M, Gomathi S, Anil M. |
| Center |
G. Kuppuswamy Naidu
Hospital, Cardiology Department, Coimbatore, India. |
| Journal |
J Am Coll
Cardiol. 2006 Sep 19;48(6):1287
|
| Shortened abstract |
OBJECTIVE: To study the
suitability of the aberrant radial artery (ARA) as an access site for
coronary angiography and angioplasty. BACKGROUND: In certain situations, the
radial artery operator finds that the right radial artery in its usual
location is unsuitable for a transradial procedure (TRP). In such cases, the
ARA should be considered as an alternate access site. METHODS: Between
January 2002 and December 2004, all patients considered suitable for a TRP
with a clinically absent radial artery, or a small radial artery and a
palpable ARA, underwent a TRP using this vessel as an access site. We
describe the technical aspects and the differences that this approach
entails, in comparison to the standard radial artery approach to TRPs.
RESULTS: Of the 3,610 patients considered suitable for a TRP, 22 patients
underwent 29 procedures using the ARA as an access site [22 angiograms and 7
percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty procedures (PTCAs)]. The
median age of the patients was 55 years, with 19 males and 3 females. All
procedures using the aberrant radial artery were successful. None of the
patients developed spasm or an access site complication. The mean
fluoroscopy time for angiography in the right radial artery group was 4.6
minutes, and 4.8 minutes for the ARA group. The procedure timed were 24
minutes and 32 minutes, respectively. CONCLUSION: The aberrant radial artery
can be used as a safe alternate access site for coronary angiography and
angioplasty when the right radial artery at the usual site is not suitable. |
|
Transradial intervention
for native fistula failure.
|
|
Authors |
Kawarada O, Yokoi Y, Nakata S, Morioka N, Takemoto K.
|
| Center |
Department of Cardiology,
Kishiwada Tokushukai Hospital, Osaka, Japan |
| Journal |
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2006 Sep 12
|
| Shortened abstract |
The native radiocephalic (Brescia-Cimino)
fistula is usually constructed with an anastomosis of the cephalic vein and
radial artery. Catheter interventions for native fistula failure have until
now been performed via the transcephalic or transbrachial approach.
Transradial intervention for native fistula failure was prospectively
evaluated for a selected consecutive 11 patients. Six patients had a single
lesion and 5 patients had double lesions. Twelve lesions were stenotic and 4
were occlusive with thrombus. Balloon angioplasty alone was successful in 10
lesions. In thrombosed fistulas, 2 lesions underwent manual
catheter-directed thrombo-aspiration and 2 further lesions underwent a
combination of catheter-directed thrombo-aspiration and mechanical
thrombectomy. Cutting Balloon angioplasty was performed for 3 resistant
venous stenoses and for 1 radial artery stenosis. Technical and clinical
success were achieved in all patients. No vessel rupture or perforation was
observed in this study, nor was distal embolization in the radial artery or
symptomatic pulmonary embolism. No radial artery occlusion or fistula
infection was seen during the follow-up. The primary patency rates were 82%
at 3 months and 64% at 6 months. Transradial intervention for native fistula
failure is considered safe and feasible in a selected population; yet
requires further validation. |
|
Day case transradial
coronary angioplasty: A four-year single-center experience.
|
|
Authors |
Wiper A, Kumar S, Macdonald J, Roberts DH.
|
| Center |
Blackpool Victoria
Hospital, Blackpool, Lancashire, England, United Kingdom. |
| Journal |
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2006 Sep 12
|
| Shortened abstract |
We examined the safety and
feasibility of elective outpatient transradial coronary angioplasty (PCI).
Four hundred and forty two patients underwent procedures over a 4-year
period. Over 95% had an excellent angiographic result and 85% were
discharged the same day. Radial access was successful in 417 (94%) patients.
There were no major vascular complications. One patient died of a subacute
stent thrombosis. Outpatient transradial PCI is safe and feasible for the
majority of elective PCI cases. |
|
Prevention of arterial
spasm during percutaneous coronary interventions through radial artery:
The SPASM study
|
|
Authors |
Varenne O, Jegou A, Cohen R, Empana JP, Salengro E,
Ohanessian A, Gaultier C, Allouch P, Walspurger S, Margot O, El Hallack A,
Jouven X, Weber S, Spaulding C |
| Center |
Cardiology Department, Cochin Hospital, Paris 5
School of Medicine, Rene Descartes Univeristy, Paris, France. |
| Journal |
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2006 July 4
|
| Shortened abstract |
Aims: Radial artery spasm
remains the major limitation of transradial approach for percutaneous
coronary interventions. The aim of our study was to evaluate the efficacy of
vasodilators in the prevention of radial artery spasm during percutaneous
coronary interventions. Methods and results: 1,219 patients were
consecutively randomized to receive placebo (n = 198), molsidomine 1 mg (n =
203), verapamil 2.5 mg (n = 409), 5 mg (n = 203) or verapamil 2.5 mg and
molsidomine 1 mg (n = 206). All drugs were administered through the arterial
sheath. The primary end point was the occurrence of a radial artery spasm
defined by the operator as severe limitation of the catheter movement, with
or without angiographic confirmation. Main characteristics including age,
sex, wrist and arterial sheath diameters and procedure duration were
identical across the groups. The rate of radial artery spasm was lowest in
patients receiving verapamil and molsidomine (4.9%), compared to verapamil
2.5 mg or 5 mg (8.3 and 7.9%), or molsidomine 1 mg (13.3%); and placebo
(22.2%) (P < 0.0001). Conclusion: Radial artery spasm during transradial
percutaneous interventions was effectively prevented by the administration
of vasodilators. The combination of verapamil 2.5 mg and molsidomine 1 mg
provided the strongest relative risk reduction of spasm compared to placebo
and should therefore be recommended during percutaneous coronary
interventions through the radial approach. |
|
Failure of transradial
approach during coronary interventions: Anatomic considerations.
|
|
Authors |
Valsecchi O, Vassileva A, Musumeci G, Rossini R,
Tespili M, Guagliumi G, Mihalcsik L, Gavazzi A, Ferrazzi P. |
| Center |
Interventional Cath Lab, Cardiovascular
Department, Ospedali Riuniti of Bergamo, Italia. |
| Journal |
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2006 Jun;67(6):870-8.
|
| Shortened abstract |
The anatomy of the radial artery has yet to
be systematically studied from the perspective of using it as a route for
catheter access. We prospectively performed angiography of the arteries of
the upper limb to delineate the anatomic features of the radial artery as a
way to determine the feasibility of using it as a route for coronary
intervention. We studied 2,211 consecutive patients submitted to transradial
cardiac catheterization. In all patients, an angiography of the upper limb
arteries was performed before and after procedure. Radial puncture was
successful in 98.9% of patients. At angiography, anatomic variations of
upper limb arteries were noted in 505 patients (22.8%) and included tortuous
configurations (3.8%), stenosis (1.7%), hypoplasias (7.7%), radioulnar loop
(0.8%), abnormal origin of the radial artery (8.3%), and lusoria subclavian
artery (0.45%). Overall procedural success by transradial approach was
97.5%. Patients with anatomic variations of radial artery had a
significantly lower puncture (96.2% vs 99.7%, P < 0.0001) and procedural
(93.1% vs 98.8%, P < 0.0001) success. The procedure was successfully
performed by radial approach in 98.8% of patients with tortuous
configurations, 91.9% of radial stenosis, 93.9% of hypoplastic radial
artery, 83.3% of radioulnar loop, 96.7% of radial axillary origin, and 60%
of lusoria subclavian artery setting. Anatomic variations of the radial
artery are not rare. However, they do not represent an important limitation
in transradial approach if they are well documented previously.
|
|
A 5Fr catheter approach
reduces patient discomfort during transradial coronary intervention
compared with a 6Fr approach: a prospective randomized study.
|
|
Authors |
Gwon HC, Doh JH, Choi JH, Lee SH, Hong KP, Park
JE, Seo JD |
| Center |
Cardiac and Vascular Center, Samsung Medical
Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea.
hcgwon@smc.samsung.co.kr |
| Journal |
J Interv Cardiol.
2006 Apr;19(2):141-7
|
| Shortened abstract |
Smaller guiding catheters can help reduce
local complications and patient morbidity during transradial coronary
intervention (TRI). This study was designed to compare the patient's
morbidity, success rate, and the operator's convenience between 5-French
(5Fr) and 6-French (6Fr) TRIs. This is a single-center prospective
randomized study. Patients who underwent TRI, in 2003, were prospectively
randomized to either 5Fr or 6Fr catheter groups (100 patients in each
group). Procedure-related patient morbidity as well as clinical and
procedural characteristics was scored and analyzed. Procedural success rate
was not significantly different between the groups. The number of
unsatisfactory supports (6% in 5Fr group, 3% in 6Fr group; P=0.31) and the
incidence of local wound complications were not significantly different
between the groups. Local wound pain scores were significantly lower in the
5Fr group compared with the 6Fr group, particularly during sheath insertion
and removal, and during procedures. Pain scores were higher in female
patients than in male patients during sheath removal (male: 1.3+/-1.3,
female: 1.7+/-1.5; P=0.049). Radial artery diameter was well correlated with
local pain score during sheath removal (r=0.31, P<0.001), and with the
height and weight of the patients (height: r=0.33, P<0.001; weight: r=0.27,
P<0.001). In conclusion, using a 5Fr catheter during TRI reduce, local
access site pain, particularly in female patients with smaller body size,
whereas the success and local complication rates were similar to a 6Fr
approach.
|
|
Percutaneous left and right
heart catheterization in fully anticoagulated patients utilizing the
radial artery and forearm vein: a two-center experience.
|
|
Authors |
Lo TS, Buch AN, Hall IR, Hildick-Smith DJ, Nolan
J |
| Center |
Cardiothoracic Centre, University Hospital of
North Staffordshire, Stoke-on-Trent, United Kingdom. |
| Journal |
J Interv Cardiol.
2006 Jun;19(3):258-63.
|
| Shortened abstract |
Background: Stopping oral anticoagulants
prior to cardiac catheterization is associated with an increased risk of
thromboembolism. Performing the procedures via the femoral artery and vein
without interruption of anticoagulation is associated with a high rate of
major access site complications. The transradial technique for left heart
catheterization is safe in fully anticoagulated patients but few data are
available on the percutaneous right and left heart catheterization utilizing
a combination of the radial artery and antecubital vein in this group of
patients. Methods: We report our experience in 28 consecutive patients that
underwent left and right heart catheterizations via this percutaneous arm
approach without interruption of anticoagulation. These were compared to 31
consecutive non-anticoagulated patients that underwent the procedure via a
conventional femoral artery and vein approach. Results: Arterial and venous
accesses were achieved and complete angiographic and hemodynamic data
obtained in all patients. There were no access site complications in the
anticoagulated patients despite an International normalized ratio (INR) of
2.5 +/- 0.5. Procedural duration was longer in the anticoagulated group of
patients, but fluoroscopy time and patient radiation dose were similar in
both groups. Conclusion: Our experience suggests that left and right heart
catheterization can be safely performed in most fully anticoagulated
patients using this technique with a low bleeding and thromboembolic risk
and no increase in radiation exposure.
|
|
Nitroglycerin,
nitroprusside, or both, in preventing radial artery spasm during
transradial artery catheterization.
|
|
Authors |
Coppola J, Patel T. Kwan T, Sanghvi K,
Srivastava S. Shah S, Staniloae C |
| Center |
Cardiology Research Office, Saint Vincent
Catholic Medical Center, New York, New York, USA. |
| Journal |
J Invasive Cardiol.
2006 Apr;18(4):155-8.
|
| Shortened abstract |
OBJECTIVE: Radial artery spasm remains a
major complication of transradial coronary interventions. The aim of this
study was to compare the efficacy of three different intra-arterial
vasodilating cocktails in reducing the incidence of radial artery spasm in
patients undergoing transradial coronary angiography. The secondary goal was
to assess the predictors of arterial spasm in this large group of patients.
METHODS: A total of 379 patients undergoing the procedure were randomly
enrolled in 1 of 3 groups. Every patient in each of the 3 groups received
intra-arterial heparin, lidocaine and diltiazem. Along with that, patients
in Group A received nitroglycerin; patients in Group B received
nitroprusside instead of nitroglycerin; and patients in Group C received
both nitroglycerin and nitroprusside. A single experienced operator, blinded
to the study drug, subjectively determined the presence of spasm. RESULTS:
Of 379 patients, a total of 44 patients (11.6%) experienced spasm. The
occurrence of spasm was similar, independent of the vasodilator cocktail
used (Group A: 12.2%, Group B: 13.4%, Group C: 9.5%; p = 0.597). After
multivariate analysis, the following variables were found to be independent
predictors of spasm: radial artery diameter (RD)/height index (p = 0.005),
RD/BSA index (p = 0.012), and sheath outer diameter (OD)/RD index (p =
0.024). CONCLUSION: In this prospective, randomized trial, the addition of a
direct nitric oxide donor to nitroglycerin in an antispastic cocktail did
not reduce the risk of spasm, and the use of nitroglycerin was found to be
as effective as nitroprusside. Also, morphometric and mechanical factors
play a significant role in predicting the occurrence of radial spasm. The
sex of the patient, presence of diabetes, body surface area and smoking
history appeared to play no role in predicting the occurrence of radial
spasm.
|
|
Transitioning from heparin
to bivalirudin in patients undergoing ad hoc transradial interventional
procedures: a pilot study
|
|
Authors |
Venkatesh K,
Mann T. |
| Center |
Wake Heart Center, Raleigh, North Carolina, USA. |
| Journal |
J Invasive Cardiol.
2006 Mar;18(3):120-4.
|
| Shortened abstract |
OBJECTIVE: The present study evaluated the
combined use of unfractionated heparin (UFH) and bivalirudin during ad hoc
transradial interventional procedures. BACKGROUND: As a result of its proven
efficacy in recent clinical trials, the direct thrombin inhibitor
bivalirudin is now increasingly utilized as the anticoagulant of choice for
coronary interventions. However, it is currently not packaged for diagnostic
procedures. Patients undergoing ad hoc transradial procedures thus need
unfractionated heparin during the diagnostic catheterization to protect
against radial occlusion. It is unclear how the transition to bivalirudin
should be undertaken if a subsequent intervention were performed. METHODS: A
total of 117 patients underwent ad hoc transradial procedures. Fifty-one
patients underwent diagnostic catheterizations receiving only 5,000 Units of
UFH in divided doses: (1) Group 1H (n = 26), 2,500 U after sheath insertion
and 2,500 U at conclusion; (2) Group 2H (n = 25), 1,000 U followed by 4,000
U. Sixty-six patients subsequently underwent interventions as part of the
same procedure and received standard bivalirudin (B) dosing in addition to
the initial UHF dose: Group 1B (n = 40), 2,500 Units of UFH plus B; Group 2B
(n = 26), 1,000 Units of UFH plus B. The primary endpoint was postprocedure
radial occlusion; secondary endpoints were any major adverse cardiac event (MACE)
and any bleeding complication. RESULTS: One patient (1%) had postprocedure
radial occlusion, but this recanalized at 1 month. There were no deaths, and
urgent target lesion revascularization was not required. Non-Q wave
myocardial infarction occurred in 7.5%, all in Group 1B. No bleeding
complications occurred. CONCLUSIONS: The administration of bivalirudin after
a reduced heparin dose in patients undergoing ad hoc transradial
interventional procedures was not associated with adverse events in this
small pilot study.
|
|
Feasibility and utility of
transradial cerebral angiography: experience during the learning period.
|
|
Authors |
Kim JH,
Park YS,
Chung CG,
Park KS,
Chung DJ,
Kim HJ. |
| Center |
Department of Diagnostic Radiology, Konyang
University Hospital, Daejeon, Korea. radol@unitel.co.kr |
| Journal |
Korean J Radiol. 2006 Jan-Mar;7(1):7-13.
|
| Shortened abstract |
OBJECTIVE: We wanted to present our
experiences for performing transradial cerebral angiography during the
learning period, and we also wanted to demonstrate this procedure's
technical feasibility and utility in various clinical situations. MATERIALS
AND METHODS: Thirty-two patients were enrolled in the study. All of them had
unfavorable situations for performing transfemoral angiography, i.e., IV
lines in the bilateral femoral vein, a phobia for groin puncture, decreased
blood platelet counts, large hematoma or bruise, atherosclerosis in the
bilateral femoral artery and the insistence of patients for choosing another
procedure. After confirming the patency of the ulnar artery with a modified
Allen's test and a pulse oximeter, the procedure was done using a 21-G
micorpuncture set and 5-F Simon II catheters. After angiography, hemostasis
was achieved with 1-2 minutes of manual compression and the subsequent
application of a hospital-made wrist brace for two hours. The technical
feasiblity and procedure-related immediate and delayed complications were
evaluated. RESULTS: The procedure was successful in 30/32 patients (93.8%).
Failure occurred in two patients; one patient had hypoplasia of the radial
artery and one patient had vasospasm following multiple puncture trials for
the radial artery. Transradial cerebral angiography was technically feasible
without significant difficulties even though it was tried during the
learning period. Pain in the forearm or arm developed in some patients
during the procedures, but this was usually mild and transient.
Procedure-related immediate complications included severe bruising in one
patient and a small hematoma in one patient. Any clinically significant
complication or delayed complication such as radial artery occlusion was not
demonstrated in our series. CONCLUSION: Transradial cerebral angiography is
a useful alternative for the patients who have unfavorable clinical
situations or contraindications for performing transfemoral cerebral
angiography. For the experienced neurointerventionalists, it seems that
additional training for performing transradial cerebral angiography is not
needed.
|
|
Transradial right and left
heart catheterizations: a comparison to traditional femoral approach
|
|
Authors |
Gilchrist IC,
Moyer CD,
Gascho JA. |
| Center |
Penn State Heart and Vascular Institute, Hershey
Medical Center, Hershey, Pennsylvania 17033-0850, USA. icg1@psu.edu |
| Journal |
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2006 Apr;67(4):585-8.
|
| Shortened abstract |
OBJECTIVES: This study compares the
transradial versus transfemoral approach to combined right- and left-heart
catheterization. BACKGROUND: Central venous access from peripheral veins has
been a historically useful technique. Although the need for right-heart
catheterization has been considered an exclusion for transradial
catheterization, we have combined a peripheral approach to the central
venous system with radial arterial access which permits bilateral heart
catheterization using a transradial approach. METHODS: Over an 18-month
period all right-heart catheterizations done in conjunction with arterial
access were reviewed. Salvage procedures, mixed site access, and biopsy
procedures were excluded. Radial procedures were performed using radial
artery access and a forearm vein. Femoral procedures used femoral artery/vein.
Demographics, procedural information, and postprocedural complications
including those requiring vascular ultrasound or transfusion were recorded
and used for comparison between groups. RESULTS: Total of 175 femoral/105
radial cases done by 4 operators met criteria for comparison. Both groups
had similar procedural indications and age. Procedural durations were
shorter (P < .01) with radial 70 +/- 5.0 min (+/-95% CI) vs. femoral 75 +/-
5.4 min (+/-95% CI). Crossover was noted in several patients from both
groups; radial procedures (n = 2) failed due to previous shoulder trauma.
Femoral crossover to radial involved difficult arterial access.
Complications related to access site occurred in 12 femoral and 0 radial
patients. CONCLUSIONS: Using the forearm for central venous access appears
safer than using the femoral vessels. Transradial catheterizations can be
done in combination with forearm venous access procedures with excellent
results and enhanced patient safety.
|
|
Transradial cardiac
catheterization in patients with coronary bypass grafts: feasibility
analysis and comparison with transfemoral approach.
|
|
Authors |
Sanmartin M,
Cuevas D,
Moxica J,
Valdes M,
Esparza J,
Baz JA,
Mantilla R,
Iniguez A. |
| Center |
Unidad de Cardiologia Intervencionista, Medtec,
Hospital Meixoeiro, Vigo, Spain. javier.goicolea.ruigomez@sergas.es |
| Journal |
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2006 Apr;67(4):580-4.
|
| Shortened abstract |
The objective of this study was to analyze
the feasibility and safety of transradial catheterization in patients with
remote surgical cardiac revascularization. Selective catheterization of
coronary bypass grafts might be more difficult and time-consuming from the
radial artery as compared to the femoral route. This special patient subset
has been either excluded or underrepresented in previous studies.
Retrospective review was made of 304 cardiac diagnostic procedures performed
from January 2001 through December 2004 in patients with coronary artery
bypass grafts in a single center. Patients had to be considered eligible for
both transradial and transfemoral approach to be included. Cases with double
internal mammary or gastroepiploic grafts were excluded. Selection of the
arterial access was individualized according to operator preferences. Among
diagnostic cases, transradial access was attempted as first choice in 151
cases (left radial in 133) and transfemoral in 154. Total procedural time
(41 +/- 22 vs. 40 +/- 23 min), fluoroscopy time (15 +/- 10 vs. 18 +/- 13
min), and dye volume (180 +/- 64 vs. 192 +/- 73 ml) were similar. Crossover
rates were 4.0% in the transradial group and 1.3% in transfemoral (P =
0.28). Only two patients in transradial group needed transfemoral access
because of failure to catheterize a bypass graft. Transradial angiography of
coronary bypass grafts can be performed with similar success rates as
compared with transfemoral procedures and without a significant time delay.
|
|
Transulnar versus
transradial artery approach for coronary angioplasty: The PCVI-CUBA study.
|
|
Authors |
Aptecar E,
Pernes JM,
Chabane-Chaouch M,
Bussy N,
Catarino G,
Shahmir A,
Bougrini K,
Dupouy P. |
| Center |
Pole Cardio-Vasculaire Interventionnel, Clinique
Les Fontaines, Melun, France. |
| Journal |
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2006 May;67(5):711-20.
|
| Shortened abstract |
Objectives: To compare in terms of efficacy
and safety the transulnar to the transradial approach for coronary
angiography and angioplasty. Background: Opposite to the transradial
approach, which is now widely used in catheterization laboratories worldwide,
the ulnar artery approach is rarely used for cardiac catheterization.
Methods: Diagnostic coronarography, followed or not by angioplasty, was
performed by transulnar or transradial approach, chosen at random. A
positive (normal) direct or reverse Allen's test was required before
tempting the radial or the ulnar approach, respectively. MACE were recorded
till 1-month follow-up. Doppler ultrasound assessment of the forearm vessels
was scheduled for all the angioplastied patients. Results: Successful access
was obtained in 93.1% of patients in the ulnar group (n = 216), and in 95.5%
of patients in the radial group (n = 215), P = NS. One hundred and three and
105 angioplasty procedures were performed in 94 and 95 patients in ulnar and
radial group, with success in 95.2% and 96.2% of procedures in ulnar and
radial group, respectively (P = NS). Freedom from MACE at 1-month follow-up
was observed in 93 patients in both groups (97.8% for ulnar group and 95.8%
for radial group), P = NS. Asymptomatic access site artery occlusion
occurred in 5.7% of patients after transulnar and in 4.7% of patients after
transradial angioplasty. A big forearm hematoma, and a little A-V fistula
were observed, each in one patient, in the ulnar group. Conclusion: The
transulnar approach for diagnostic and therapeutic coronary interventions is
a safe and effective alternative to the transradial approach, as both
techniques share a high success rate and an extremely low incidence of entry
site complications. The transulnar approach has the potential to spare
injury to the radial artery in anticipation of its use as a coronary bypass
conduit.
|
|
Transradial unprotected
left main coronary stenting supported by percutaneous Impella((R)) Recover
LP 2.5 assist device.
|
|
Authors |
Minden HH,
Lehmann H,
Meyhofer J,
Butter C |
| Center |
Immanuel Diakonie Group, Heart Center
Brandenburg in Bernau, Department of Cardiology, Ladeburger Strasse 17,
16321, Bernau, Germany, h.minden@immanuel.de. |
| Journal |
Clin Res Cardiol. 2006 Mar 21; [Epub ahead of print]
|
| Shortened abstract |
Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) has
been increasingly applied to patients with severely depressed left
ventricular function and complex coronary lesions. The availability of
hemodynamic support devices offers a promising option to reduce PCI-related
complications in high-risk procedures. We report the case of a 79-year-old
man who suffered from unstable angina. The coronary angiogram revealed
multivessel disease including a significant distal left main (LM) stenosis.
Additionally, the patient had a history of chronic lymphatic leukemia with
immune hemolysis. Therefore, the patient was considered to be at
exceptionally high mortality risk in case of cardiac surgery. We decided to
perform a percutaneous revascularization of the LM supported by the Impella((R))
Recover LP 2.5 assist device. This case report discusses the principles of
indications, technique and complications of this new addition to
interventional cardiolgogy.
|
|
Feasibility of transradial
coronary angiography and angioplasty in Chinese patients
|
|
Authors |
Tse TS,
Lam KK,
Tsui KL,
Chan CK,
Leung GT,
Choi MC,
Ko WC,
Chan KK,
Li SK |
| Center |
Department of Medicine, Pamela Youde Nethersole
Eastern Hospital, 3 Lok Man Road, Chai Wan, Hong Kong. tsetaksun@gmail.com |
| Journal |
Hong Kong Med J. 2006 Apr;12(2):108-14.
|
| Shortened abstract |
OBJECTIVE: To assess the clinical
applicability, efficacy, and safety of coronary angiography and angioplasty
via a transradial approach in local Chinese patients. DESIGN: Prospective
case series. SETTING: Regional hospital, Hong Kong. PATIENTS: All patients
undergoing coronary angiography and coronary angioplasty between 1 January
and 30 June 2004. INTERVENTIONS: Transradial coronary angiography and
coronary angioplasty. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Feasibility, success rate, and
complications. RESULTS: A total of 268 coronary angiographies (62% of all
coronary angiographies) and 118 coronary angioplasties (48% of all coronary
angioplasties) were performed via a transradial approach. The procedural
success rate for coronary angiography was 93.7% with a mean duration of 21.8
(standard deviation, 13.5) minutes compared with 17.9 (10.0) minutes for
angiography via a femoral approach. Most (99%) patients were free from any
complications. Of those patients who underwent elective transradial coronary
angiography in the morning, 64% were discharged on the same day. Comparison
of data in the first half of the study period with those in the second half
revealed a significant increase in the percentage of coronary angiographies
performed via a transradial approach (from 52% to 73%, P<0.0001), and an
improved procedural success rate (from 91.5% to 95.3%, P=0.1). For
transradial coronary angioplasty, the procedural success rate was 98%. A
total of 246 lesions (2.08 lesions per patient) were treated with no
procedure-related complications. CONCLUSIONS: Transradial coronary
angiography and angioplasty are feasible in a significant proportion of
local Chinese patients and achieve a high success rate and low complication
rate. It tends to prolong procedural duration, but improves patients'
comfort and permits earlier ambulation and discharge. The procedural success
rate improves with accumulating experience.
|
|
Failure of transradial
approach during coronary interventions: Anatomic considerations.
|
|
Authors |
Valsecchi O,
Vassileva A,
|