26 Publications > New
New publications for this moment
Here you see the latest publications on the transradial technique.  For an overview of all the articles see the index.
Comparative study of nicorandil and a spasmolytic cocktail in preventing radial artery spasm during transradial coronary angiography.
Authors Kim SH, Kim EJ, Cheon WS, Kim MK, Park WJ, Cho GY, Choi YJ, Rhim CY.
Center

Division of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine, Hallym University Medical Center, 94-200, Yeongdeungpo-dong, Yeongdeungpo-gu, 150-030, Seoul, Republic of Korea. cardioguy@korea.ac.kr

Journal
Int J Cardiol. 2007 Sep 3;120(3):325-30
Shortened abstract
BACKGROUND: Radial artery spasm is one of the most common complications during coronary angiography via the transradial approach, causing patient discomfort or sometimes interrupting the procedure. This study was designed to compare the spasmolytic effect between nicorandil and a cocktail during transradial coronary angiography. METHODS: A randomized study to compare 4 mg of nicorandil and a cocktail (mixture of normal saline, 200 microg of verapamil) was performed in 150 patients. We examined vasospasms of the radial artery that were expressed as stenosis of the radial artery vessel diameter after the procedure. RESULT: The reductions of systolic and diastolic blood pressures showed no significant differences between the two groups (15.4+/-11.5/7.7+/-7.8 mmHg for nicorandil and 16.3+/-13.4/6.2 mmHg for cocktail). Both agents induced a significant radial artery vasodilation after transradial administration at proximal and mid segments (P < 0.001 for all). Nicorandil showed a significant increase of the mean change of the radial artery diameter compared to the cocktail at mid-segment (0.32+/-0.23 mm for nicorandil and 0.24+/-0.15 mm for a cocktail, P < 0.05). There was no statistically significant difference between the two groups in radial artery spasm (50.7% vs. 52.0% in nicorandil and a cocktail, respectively) after catheterization. CONCLUSION: Nicorandil with vasodilator effects by a dual mechanism was effective as the cocktail in preventing radial artery spasm during transradial coronary angiography.
Transradial approach for carotid artery stenting: a feasibility study.
Authors Folmar J, Sachar R, Mann T.
Center

Wake Heart and Vascular Associates, Wake Heart Center, 3000 New Bern Avenue, Raleigh, NC 27610, USA.

Journal
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2007 Feb 15;69(3):355-61
Shortened abstract
BACKGROUND: Carotid artery stenting (CAS) has become accepted as an alternative to carotid endarterectomy for revascularization of the internal carotid artery (ICA) among high risk patients. CAS from the femoral approach can be problematic due to access site complications as well as technical difficulties related to peripheral vascular disease (PVD) and/or anatomical variations of the aortic arch. The purpose of the present study is to evaluate the feasibility of the radial artery as an alternative approach for CAS. METHODS: Forty-two patients (mean age 71 +/- 1, 26 male) underwent CAS. All had a CA stenosis greater than 80% and comorbid conditions increasing the risk of carotid endarterectomy. The target common carotid artery (CCA) was initially cannulated via the radial artery using a 5F Simmons 1 diagnostic catheter which was then advanced to the external CA (ECA) over an extra support 0.014" coronary guidewire. After removing the coronary guidewire, a 0.035" guidewire was advanced into the ECA, and the Simmons 1 was exchanged for a 5F or 6F shuttle sheath and positioned in the distal CCA. In four patients with a bovine aortic arch, the left CCA was accessed with a 5F Amplatz R2 catheter which was then exchanged for a shuttle sheath over a 0.035" guidewire. CAS was performed using standard techniques with weight-based bivalirudin for anticoagulation. RESULTS: CAS was successful in 35/42 (83%) patients, including 28/29 (97%) right CA, 4/5 (80%) bovine left CA, 7/13 (54%) left CA. Mean interventional time was 30 +/- 3 minutes. The sheath was removed immediately after the procedure. There were no radial access site complications. One patient sustained a stroke 24 hrs after the procedure with complete resolution of symptoms (Mean NIH stroke scale 2.0 +/- 0.3 before, 1.9 +/- 0.3 after). Median hospital stay was 2 +/- 0.6 days. Inadequate catheter support at the origin of the CCA was the technical cause of failure in the seven unsuccessful cases. CONCLUSION: CAS using the transradial approach appears to be safe and technically feasible. The technique may be particularly useful in patients with right ICA lesions and severe PVD or unfavorable arch anatomy, and among patients with a bovine aortic arch.
Overview of the transradial approach in percutaneous coronary intervention.
Authors Amoroso G, Laarman GJ, Kiemeneij F.
Center

Department of Interventional Cardiology, Onze Lieve Vrouwe Gasthuis, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. G.Amoroso@olvg.nl

Journal
J Cardiovasc Med (Hagerstown). 2007 Apr;8(4):230-7.
Shortened abstract
Thirteen years have passed since the first percutaneous coronary intervention was performed at Onze Lieve Vrouwe Gasthuis in Amsterdam using the transradial approach (TRA). Since then TRA has spread through the interventional community and many centres have now adopted TRA as the arterial access of choice. This review is focused on the hot issues and the latest developments in this field. The following subjects will be addressed and discussed: drawbacks and learning curve, procedural technique, indications (with particular attention to acute coronary patients), complications, contraindications, nurse workload, patient management, and economics.
Comparison of immediate and followup results between transradial and transfemoral approach for percutaneous coronary intervention in true bifurcational lesions.
Authors Yang YJ, Xu B, Chen JL, Kang S, Qiao SB, Qin XW, Yao M, Chen J, Wu YJ, Liu HB, Yuan JQ, You SJ, Li JJ, Dai J, Gao RL.
Center

Centre for Coronary Artery Disease, Department of Cardiology, Cardiovascular Institute and Fuwai Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing 100037, China. yyj58@yahoo.com

Journal
Chin Med J (Engl). 2007 Apr 5;120(7):539-44.
Shortened abstract
BACKGROUND: A comparison of efficacy and safety between transradial and transfemoral approach for percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in bifurcations has not been done. This study evaluated feasibility of transradial PCI (TRI) and compared the immediate and followup results with transfemoral PCI (TFI) in bifurcations. METHODS: One hundred and thirty-four consecutive patients with bifurcations were treated with PCI in our hospital from April 2004 to October 2005. Of these, there were 60 patients (88 lesions) in TRI group and 74 patients (101 lesions) in TFI group. Bifurcations type was classified according to the Institut Cardiovasculaire Paris Sud Classification. RESULTS: TRI group had smaller stent diameter ((3.06 +/- 0.37) mm vs (3.18 +/- 0.35) mm, P = 0.023) and postprocedural in-stent minimum lumen diameter ((2.62 +/- 0.37) mm vs (2.74 +/- 0.41) mm, P = 0.029) than TFI, but there were not significant differences in in-stent subacute thrombosis rate (0% vs 1.0%, P = 0.349), target lesion revascularization (TLR) (0% vs 1.0%, P = 0.349) following procedure and thrombosis (2.3% vs 1.0%, P = 0.482), in-stent restenosis (12.5% vs 10.9%, P = 0.731), in-segment restenosis (17.0% vs 14.9%, P = 0.681), TLR (10.2% vs 13.9%, P = 0.446) and TLR-free cumulative survival rate (89.8% vs 86.1%, P = 0.787) at seven months followup. No death was reported in the two groups. CONCLUSION: Transradial intervention is feasible and appears to be as effective and safe as transfemoral PCI in treatment of true bifurcational lesions.
Risk of acute brain injury related to cerebral microembolism during cardiac catheterization performed by right upper limb arterial access.
Authors Hamon M, Gomes S, Clergeau MR, Fradin S, Morello R
Center

 

Journal
Stroke. 2007 Jul;38(7):2176-9. Epub 2007 May 24.
Shortened abstract
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: The primary objective of this study was to assess the incidence of new cerebral infarcts related to cardiac catheterization in patients explored through the right transradial approach. METHODS: This prospective study involved 41 consecutive patients with severe aortic valve stenosis. To assess the incidence of cerebral infarction, all patients underwent cerebral diffusion-weighted MRI before and after cardiac catheterization through the right transradial approach. RESULTS: We detected only two patients (4.9%) with new, small, isolated acute cerebral diffusion abnormalities postcatheterization. All patients remained asymptomatic. CONCLUSIONS: New cerebral lesions on diffusion-weighted MRI are infrequent in patients explored through the right transradial approach. Randomized studies are warranted to confirm for potential advantages of transradial approach versus the femoral approach in cardiac catheterization
Feasibility and safety of transradial stenting for unprotected left main coronary artery stenoses.
Authors Cheng CI, Wu CJ, Fang CY, Youssef AA, Chen CJ, Chen SM, Yang CH, Hsueh SK, Yip HK, Chen MC, Fu M, Hsieh YK.
Center

Graduate Institute of Clinical Medical Sciences, Chang Gung University College of Medicine, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital-Kaohsiung Medical Center, No.123 Ta-Pei Road, Niao-Sung Township, Kaohsiung County, 83301 Taiwan, ROC.

Journal
Circ J. 2007 Jun;71(6):855-61.
Shortened abstract
BACKGROUND: Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) is considered an excellent alternative treatment for unprotected left main coronary artery (ULMCA) stenoses. Most PCIs for ULMCA stenoses are performed via the transfemoral approach. The feasibility and safety of the transradial approach for this particular entity are unknown. The present study assessed the feasibility, safety and 1-year outcomes of the transradial approach for stenting of ULMCA stenoses. METHODS AND RESULTS: Of 131 consecutive patients who underwent coronary stenting for ULMCA stenoses, 113 patients (86.3%) received stenting using the transradial approach. All 113 procedures were performed with 6 or 7 French (Fr) catheters except 1 procedure requiring an 8 Fr guiding catheter for directional atherectomy. The technical success rate was 100%, and angiographic success was achieved in 96 patients (85.9%). Two patients had local hematoma (1.8%), and no procedure-related deaths, Q-wave myocardial infarction, repetitive PCI, stroke or emergent coronary artery bypass graft surgery during hospitalization were noted. One (0.9%) in-hospital cardiac death occurred due to ventricular tachyarrhythmia. More than half of our patients stayed in hospital by < or =3 days. The 1-year target lesion revascularization and cardiac death rate were 14.2% and 3.5%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: This investigation demonstrated the feasibility, safety and accepted short-term clinical outcomes of transradial stenting for ULMCA stenosis. This procedure may offer a feasible alternative to the transfemoral approach.
Transradial access in a cath lab with moderate procedural volume: a single operator's experience.
Authors Rigattieri S, Ferraiuolo G, Loschiavo P.
Center

Cardiology Department, Sandro Pertini Hospital, Rome, Italy. stefanorigattieri@yahoo.it

Journal
 Minerva Cardioangiol. 2007 Jun;55(3):303-9
Shortened abstract
AIM: The transradial access (TRA) for cardiovascular interventions has become increasingly popular and was shown to be effective in many clinical settings, including acute coronary syndromes. Despite offering many advantages, such as a striking reduction in access site complications, the penetration of TRA in routine practice is still low. One reason for this could be that many studies about TRA were performed in high-volume centers by expert operators, making their results not fully applicable to the real world. In order to assess the efficacy of TRA, we retrospectively reviewed the caseload of a single operator working in a community hospital with moderate procedural volume. METHODS: We considered 873 consecutive procedures, of which 406 percutaneous coronary interventions (PCI), performed by a single operator (S.R.) who had previously completed the learning curve in TRA at a high volume center. RESULTS: TRA was selected in 48.3% of patients, transfemoral approach (TFA) in 50.9% and transbrachial approach in 0.8%. TFA was used more frequently in PCI (62.5% vs 37.5%; P<0.001), largely because it was the access of choice in primary PCI. The overall procedural success rate was 94% in TRA and 98% in TFA (P=0.035); access failure was more frequent in TRA (5.9% vs 1.1%; P<0.001), whereas an increased rate of access-related vascular complications was observed in TFA as compared to TRA (1.1% vs 0%; P=0.029). CONCLUSION: After an adequate training period, the overall performance of TRA is good even in moderate-volume hospitals. Despite reducing access site complications, TRA is limited by a slightly higher rate of procedural failure as compared to TFA.
Reduced vascular complications and length of stay with transradial rescue angioplasty for acute myocardial infarction.
Authors Cruden NL, Teh CH, Starkey IR, Newby DE.
Center

Centre for Cardiovascular Science, University of Edinburgh, Royal Infirmary of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom.

Journal
 Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2007 Jun 11
Shortened abstract
OBJECTIVES:: The aim of this study was to compare clinical outcomes for transradial and transfemoral percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction undergoing rescue angioplasty. BACKGROUND:: Transfemoral percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with acute myocardial infarction treated with systemic thrombolysis is associated with a significant risk of vascular complications. A transradial approach may reduce vascular complications, improve mobilization and facilitate earlier discharge. METHODS:: In a retrospective analysis, clinical outcomes for 287 consecutive patients undergoing rescue angioplasty for acute myocardial infarction were determined. Data were recorded using a standardized proforma and analyzed using SPSS. RESULTS:: Procedural success was similar for the transradial and transfemoral routes (98% vs. 93%; P = 0.3). There was a reduction in vascular complications (0 (0%) vs. 32 (13%); P < 0.01) and post-procedural length of stay (7.0 +/- 7.9 vs. 7.9 +/- 5.6 days; P < 0.005) in the radial group when compared with the femoral group. There were no differences in procedural or in-hospital mortality, procedure duration, or radiation dose between the two groups. CONCLUSION:: Rescue angioplasty performed via the radial artery is safe, effective, and associated with a reduction in vascular complications and length of hospital stay when compared with the femoral approach. These findings suggest that where facilities and experience allow rescue angioplasty in patients with acute myocardial infarction should be performed via the radial artery.
Feasibility and Safety of Transradial Arterial Approach for Simultaneous Right and Left Vertebral Artery Angiographic Studies and Stenting.
Authors Yip HK, Youssef AA, Chang WN, Lu CH, Yang CH, Chen SM, Wu CJ.
Center

Division of Cardiology, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital- Kaohsiung Medical Center, Chang Gung University Collage of Medicine, Kaohsiung, Taiwan, R.O.C.

Journal
 Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 2007 Jun 22;
Shortened abstract
OBJECTIVES: This study investigated whether the transradial artery (TRA) approach using a 6-French (F) Kimny guiding catheter for right vertebral artery (VA) angiographic study and stenting is safe and effective for patients with significant VA stenosis. BACKGROUND: The TRA approach is commonly performed worldwide for both diagnostic cardiac catheterization and catheter-based coronary intervention. However, to our knowledge, the safety and feasibility of left and right VA angiographic study and stenting, in the same procedure, using the TRA approach for patients with brain ischemia have not been reported. METHODS: The study included 24 consecutive patients (22 male,2 female; age, 63-78 years). Indications for VA angiographic study and stenting were (1) prior stroke or symptoms related to vertebrobasilar ischemia and (2) an asymptomatic but vertebral angiographic finding of severe stenosis (>70%). A combination of the ipsilateral and retrograde-engagement technique, which involved a looping 6-F Kimny guiding catheter, was utilized for VA angiographic study. For VA stenting, an ipsilateral TRA approach with either a Kimny guiding catheter or a left internal mammary artery guiding catheter was utilized in 22 patients and retrograde-engagement technique in 2 patients. RESULTS: A technically successful procedure was achieved in all patients, including left VA stenting in 15 patients and right VA stenting in 9 patients. The mean time for stenting (from engagement to stent deployment) was 12.7 min. There were no vascular complications or mortality. However, one patient suffered from a transient ischemic attack that resolved within 3 h. CONCLUSION: We conclude that TRA access for both VA angiographic study and VA stenting is safe and effective, and provides a simple and useful clinical tool for patients unsuited for femoral arterial access.
Transradial approach for noncoronary angiography and interventions.
Authors Yamashita T, Imai S, Tamada T, Yamamoto A, Egashira N, Watanabe S, Higashi H, Gyoten M.
Center

Department of Diagnostic Radiology, Kawasaki Medical School, Okayama, Japan. takenori@med.kawasaki-m.ac.jp

Journal
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2007 Aug 1;70(2):303-8.
Shortened abstract
 PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to retrospectively evaluate the feasibility and safety of a transradial approach for non-coronary angiography and interventions. BACKGROUND: Generally, the transradial approach is used for coronary angiography and intervention around the world, and experiences have been widely reported. However, few large studies have examined the transradial approach for vessels other than the coronary or cerebral artery. METHODS: Subjects comprised 329 patients who underwent a total of 400 procedures (285 abdomens, 68 pelvises, and 47 lower limbs) with transradial angiography and interventions between January 1999 and June 2006. Normal Allen test results were confirmed before all procedures. A 130- or 150-cm long 4F catheter modified to our own design was used for angiography and interventions such as transarterial embolization or transarterial chemotherapy. RESULTS: Radial artery access was unachievable in 19 of the 400 procedures (4.8%). The radial artery was injured during 1 procedure (0.2%). In the remaining 380 procedures, sufficient angiography was obtained to grasp the condition of indispensable vessels for diagnosis and interventions scheduled in advance succeeded. Total transradial technical success rate in the series was 95%. Frequency of complications such as radial injury or radial spasm was 1.8%. No cases of local hematoma, hand ischemia, or cerebral infarction were encountered. CONCLUSION: The transradial approach was useful for non-coronary angiography and interventions and offers the advantages of low risk and reduced stress on patients.
Interruption of blood flow during compression and radial artery occlusion after transradial catheterization.
Authors Sanmartin M, Gomez M, Rumoroso JR, Sadaba M, Martinez M, Baz JA, Iniguez A.
Center

Unidad de Cardiologia Intervencionista, Medtec, Hospital Meixoeiro, Vigo, Spain.

Journal
Cathet Cardiovasc Interv 2007 Jan 3
Shortened abstract
Objectives: To analyze the possible relationship between compression after transradial catheterization and radial artery occlusion. Background: Radial artery occlusion is an important concern of transradial catheterization. Interruption of radial artery flow during compression might influence the rate of radial artery occlusion at follow-up. Methods: A prospective study including 275 consecutive patients undergoing transradial catheterization was conducted. Arterial sheaths were removed immediately after procedures and conventional compressive dressings were left in place for 2 hr. The pulse oximeter signal in the index finger during ipsilateral ulnar compression was used for the assessment of radial artery flow. Results: Radial artery flow was absent in 174 cases (62%) immediately after entry-site compression. After 2 hr of conventional hemostasis, radial artery flow was absent in 162 cases (58%) before bandage removal. At 7-day follow-up, 12 patients (4.4%) had absent pulsations and radial artery flow was absent in 29 cases (10.5%). Patients with an occluded radial artery at follow-up had significantly smaller arterial diameters at baseline (2.23 +/- 0.4 mm vs. 2.40 +/- 0.5 mm; P = 0.032) and more frequently had absent flow during hemostasis (90% vs. 54%, P < 0.001). Stepwise logistic regression analysis revealed that absent flow before compressive bandages removal was the only independent predictor of radial artery occlusion at follow-up (OR = 6.7; IC 95%: 1.95-22.9; P = 0.002). Conclusions: Flow-limiting compression is a frequent finding during conventional hemostasis after transradial catheterization. Absence of radial artery flow during compression represents a strong predictor of radial artery occlusion.
 
Transradial approach for carotid artery stenting: A feasibility study.
Authors Folmar J, Sachar R, Mann T
Center

Wake Heart and Vascular Associates, Wake Heart Center, Raleigh, North Carolina.

Journal
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2007 Jan 17;69(3):355-361
Shortened abstract
Background: Carotid artery stenting (CAS) has become accepted as an alternative to carotid endarterectomy for revascularization of the internal carotid artery (ICA) among high risk patients. CAS from the femoral approach can be problematic due to access site complications as well as technical difficulties related to peripheral vascular disease (PVD) and/or anatomical variations of the aortic arch. The purpose of the present study is to evaluate the feasibility of the radial artery as an alternative approach for CAS. Methods: Forty-two patients (mean age 71 +/- 1, 26 male) underwent CAS. All had a CA stenosis greater than 80% and comorbid conditions increasing the risk of carotid endarterectomy. The target common carotid artery (CCA) was initially cannulated via the radial artery using a 5F Simmons 1 diagnostic catheter which was then advanced to the external CA (ECA) over an extrasupport 0.014" coronary guidewire. After removing the coronary guidewire, a 0.035" guidewire was advanced into the ECA, and the Simmons 1 was exchanged for a 5F or 6F shuttle sheath and positioned in the distal CCA. In four patients with a bovine aortic arch, the left CCA was accessed with a 5F Amplatz R2 catheter which was then exchanged for a shuttle sheath over a 0.035" guidewire. CAS was performed using standard techniques with weight-based bivalirudin for anticoagulation. Results: CAS was successful in 35/42 (83%) patients, including 28/29 (97%) right CA, 4/5 (80%) bovine left CA, 7/13 (54%) left CA. Mean interventional time was 30 +/- 3 minutes. The sheath was removed immediately after the procedure. There were no radial access site complications. One patient sustained a stroke 24 hrs after the procedure with complete resolution of symptoms (Mean NIH stroke scale 2.0 +/- 0.3 before, 1.9 +/- 0.3 after). Median hospital stay was 2 +/- 0.6 days. Inadequate catheter support at the origin of the CCA was the technical cause of failure in the seven unsuccessful cases. Conclusion: CAS using the transradial approach appears to be safe and technically feasible. The technique may be particularly useful in patients with right ICA lesions and severe PVD or unfavorable arch anatomy, and among patients with a bovine aortic arch.

 

The effect of a eutectic mixture of local anesthetic cream on wrist pain during transradial coronary procedures.
Authors Kim JY, Yoon J, Yoo BS, Lee SH, Choe KH.
Center

Wonju College of Medicine, Yonsei University, Wonju, Kangwon Province, South Korea

Journal
J Invasive Cardiol. 2007 Jan;19(1):6-9.
Shortened abstract

OBJECTIVE: We sought to evaluate the effects and optimal application time of a eutectic mixture of local anesthetic cream (EMLA-C) in relieving wrist pain during transradial coronary procedures (TRCP). METHODS: The Phase I study enrolled 147 patients to evaluate the efficacy and safety of the EMLA-C during TRCP. The Phase II study was designed to evaluate the optimal preprocedure application time frame of EMLA-C for wrist pain reduction in 400 patients. The EMLA or placebo cream was applied at the puncture site from 2 to 4 hours before the procedure in Phase I, and randomized to 5 time groups according to the time of drug application in Phase II. We evaluated wrist pain by the visual analogue scale (VAS) or verbal rating scale (VRS-4), and evaluated complications as well. RESULTS: EMLA-C demonstrated greater pain relief by VAS (control: 49+/-24, EMLA: 19+/-22; p = 0.001) and VRS-4 (control: 2.3+/-0.5, EMLA: 1.5+/-0.6; p = 0.001), and there was a negative correlation (r = -0.476; p = 0.001) between VAS and the preprocedure application time of EMLA-C. In Phase II, there was a significant difference in pain levels between the control and 1- to 2-hour groups by VAS (control: 49+/-29, EMLA1-2 hours: 32+/-24; p = 0.001) and VRS-4 (control: 2.4+/-0.6, EMLA1-2 hours: 1.9+/-0.6; p = 0.001). Drug-induced local erythema frequently occurred in the 3- to 4-hour group (6.6%) and >4 hours group (11.9%). CONCLUSIONS: EMLA-C can be effective in reducing wrist pain during TRCP without any significant drug-related complications when the application time is 1 to 3 hours before the procedure.

Percutaneous treatment of dysfunctional Brescia-Cimino fistulae through a radial arterial approach.
Authors Wang HJ, Yang YF.
Center

Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Cardiology, China Medical University Hospital, Taichung, Taiwan. joe5977@ms32.hinet.net

Journal
Am J Kidney Dis. 2006 Oct;48(4):652-8
Shortened abstract

BACKGROUND: Dysfunctional Brescia-Cimino fistulae contribute to significant morbidity in hemodialysis patients. These fistulae normally are treated through a retrograde venous approach. There are no data regarding a transradial approach. Furthermore, measurement of pressure reduction in the radial artery appears to be useful. METHODS: We retrospectively examined 50 interventions to treat 49 patients (17 men, 32 women; mean age, 61.8 +/- 10.6 years) with Brescia-Cimino fistulae. Inclusion criteria were patients with palpable radial arteries and dysfunctional end-to-side Brescia-Cimino fistulae. Patients with infected fistulae, contrast allergy, upper-arm/synthetic graft/central-vein stenosis, and end-to-end Brescia-Cimino fistulae were excluded from the study. Radial arterial pressures before and after angioplasty were compared as a surrogate of stenosis relief. Anatomic and clinical success rates were calculated. RESULTS: Sixty-five stenoses and 4 total occlusions were treated through radial access. All radial punctures were successful, except in 1 patient. Most lesions were located in the cephalic vein (87%). Mean length of treated lesions was 4.1 +/- 2.8 cm. Mean pretreatment diameter of lesion stenoses was 76.7% +/- 12.1%. Mean posttreatment diameter stenosis was 22.6% +/- 8.2% (P < 0.001). Systolic, diastolic, and mean blood pressures recorded from the radial artery decreased from 130 +/- 40, 60 +/- 18, and 87 +/- 27 to 88 +/- 40, 43 +/- 18, and 60 +/- 26 mm Hg (P < 0.001, P < 0.001, and P < 0.001), respectively. The anatomic success rate of the transradial approach was 91.3%. The clinical success rate of the transradial approach was 96%. CONCLUSION: The transradial approach is a feasible and highly effective approach to treat dysfunctional Brescia-Cimino fistulae. Measuring blood pressure reduction through the radial artery appears promising as a hemodynamic evaluation method.

Hours during and after coronary intervention and angiography.
Authors Lunden MH, Bengtson A, Lundgren SM.
Center

Sahlgrenska Academy at Goteborg University, Goteborg, Sweden.

Journal
Clin Nurs Res. 2006 Nov;15(4):274-89
Shortened abstract

The purpose of this study was to describe patients' experience during and after coronary angiography and percutaneous coronary intervention. Data were collected by interviews with 14 patients. A qualitative content analysis approach was used. Four main categories were identified that describe patients' experience of the hours during and following intervention: emotional thoughts, bodily sensations, nursing intervention of importance, and personal strategies. All patients made a comment on staff conduct and pointed out that even minor nursing actions may be of great importance. Patients were most positive toward the transradial approach. Even though the approach via arteria radialis will increase, many patients will still have their procedure done via arteria femoralis. In spite of all research and technical developments, the patients' experience from intervention via arteria femoralis is pretty much the same as it was 1997.

The feasibility of percutaneous transradial coronary intervention for chronic total occlusion.
Authors Kim JY, Lee SH, Choe HM, Yoo BS, Yoon J, Choe KH.
Center

Division of Cardiology, Yonsei University, Wonju College of Medicine, 162 Ilsan-dong, Wonju 220-701, Korea.

Journal
Yonsei Med J. 2006 Oct 31;47(5):680-7.
Shortened abstract

We evaluated the feasibility of the transradial coronary intervention (TRCI) in 85 consecutive patients with chronic total occlusion (CTO). Clinical, angiographic and procedural factors were compared between the success and failure groups. An overall success rate of 65.5% (57 of 87 lesions) was achieved with TRCI, and the most common cause of failure was an inability to pass the lesion with a guidewire. A multivariate analysis demonstrated that the most significant predictor of failure was the duration of occlusion (OR 1.064 per month, 95% CI 1.005 to 1.126, p = 0.03). The procedural success rate improved with use of new-generation hydrophilic guidewires. The 6 Fr guiding catheters were used in the majority of the 70 cases (81%). Five cases were crossed over to a femoral artery approach due to engagement failure of the guiding catheter into the coronary ostium because of severe subclavian tortuosity and stenosis in two cases, radial artery looping in one case, and poor guiding support in two cases. There were no major entry site complications. In conclusion, the radial artery might be a feasible vascular route in coronary interventions for CTO, with comparable procedural success and no access site complications

[Psychologic status comparison in patients treated with transradial or transfermoral approach coronary catheterizations]
Authors Chen Y, Qiu YG, Zhu JH, Zheng P, Chen JZ, Zhang FR, Zhao LL, Tao QM, Zheng LR
Center

Department of Cardiology, First Affiliated Hospital, College of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310003, China.

Journal
Zhonghua Xin Xue Guan Bing Za Zhi. 2006 Aug;34(8):714-7.
Shortened abstract

OBJECTIVE: We previously showed that factorial score of somatization, which was obtained by the examination of symptom checklist-90 (SCL-90), was higher in patients received transfemoral coronary catheterization than norm. The aim of the present study was to compare the patient's psychologic status between transradial approach and transfemoral approach percutaneous coronary catheterizations. METHODS: A total of 198 inpatients (105 transfemoral, 93 transradial) underwent scheduled first time coronary catheterizations were enrolled. All patients were studied by symptom SCL-90 on present psychologic status 24 hours before and 24-48 hours after coronary catheterizations. RESULTS: Age, sex, weight, smokers, employment, educational background, marriage status, family relations, family history of cardiovascular disease, income and medical insurance status were similar between the two groups. There was also no difference in diabetes, hypertension history as well as coronary heart disease confirmed by coronary catheterization between the 2 groups. Compared with the status before the procedure, factorial scores of somatization, obsessive-compulsive, interpersonal sensitivity, depression, anxiety, hostility, global severity index and total positive symptoms were significantly reduced after percutaneous coronary catheterizations (1.50 +/- 0.51 vs. 1.64 +/- 0.53, 1.50 +/- 0.48 vs. 1.67 +/- 0.55, 1.28 +/- 0.41 vs. 1.38 +/- 0.49, 1.42 +/- 0.43 vs. 1.55 +/- 0.53, 1.38 +/- 0.41 vs. 1.58 +/- 0.54, 1.32 +/- 0.35 vs. 1.44 +/- 0.41, 1.38 +/- 0.34 vs. 1.49 +/- 0.42, and 23.08 +/- 17.30 vs. 27.72 +/- 18.79, respectively, P all < 0.05). Scores on somatization, depression and positive symptom severity index were significantly lower in patients received transradial coronary catheterizations than those received transfermoral coronary catheterization approach (1.52 +/- 0.51 vs. 1.62 +/- 0.53, 1.43 +/- 0.54 vs. 1.54 +/- 0.43 and 2.36 +/- 0.66 vs. 2.50 +/- 0.43, respectively, P all < 0.05). CONCLUSION: Patients' psychologic status improved significantly after percutaneous coronary catheterizations. Improvement on psychologic status is significantly better in patients underwent transradial coronary catheterizations than that underwent transfemoral coronary catheterizations.

Repeat right transradial percutaneous coronary intervention in a patient with dextrocardia: The right approach to the right-sided heart.
Authors Chen JP
Center

 

Journal
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2006 Dec 26
Shortened abstract

Dextrocardia (DC) is a rare cardiac condition in which the cardiac location, as well as apex, is rightwardly displaced. As the incidence of atherosclerotic disease is similar to that of the general population, there have been few reports of percutaneous coronary interventions (PCIs) in these patients. Proposed technical strategies for successful angiography and PCI in DC include counter-directional torquing of the catheter, as well as right-left mirror-image inversion angiographic views. All previous reports of DC PCIs have been via transfemoral access.We present a case of successful repeat transradial PCI in a patient with DC. This is first report of transradial coronary angiography, PCI, or repeat PCI in a DC patient. A literature review of technical considerations, including our own recommendations for guide catheter selection, are discussed. We also review the anatomic variations and epidemiology of DC. Although access complications for transradial PCI is known to be lower than that of the transfemoral approach, challenges in technique and concern of repeat access have limited the popularity of the former. Our report demonstrates the safety and feasibility of transradial angiography, PCI, and even repeat PCI, in the rare patient with DC. (c) 2006 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

A randomized study comparing same-day home discharge and abciximab bolus only to overnight hospitalization and abciximab bolus and infusion after transradial coronary stent implantation.
Authors Bertrand OF, De Larochelliere R, Rodes-Cabau J, Proulx G, Gleeton O, Nguyen CM, Dery JP, Barbeau G, Noel B, Larose E, Poirier P, Roy L; Early Discharge After Transradial Stenting of Coronary Arteries Study Investigators.
Center

Hopital Laval, Institut Universitaire de Cardiologie et de Pneumologie, affilie a l'Universite Laval, 2725 Chemin Ste Foy, Quebec, Canada G1V 4G5. Olivier.Bertrand@crhl.ulaval.ca

Journal
Circulation. 2006 Dec 12;114(24):2636-43
Shortened abstract

BACKGROUND: Systematic use of coronary stents and optimized platelet aggregation inhibition has greatly improved the short-term results of percutaneous coronary interventions. Transradial percutaneous coronary interventions have been associated with a low risk of bleeding complications. It is unknown whether moderate- and high-risk patients can be discharged safely the same day after uncomplicated transradial percutaneous coronary interventions. METHODS AND RESULTS: We randomized 1005 patients after a bolus of abciximab and uncomplicated transradial percutaneous coronary stent implantation either to same-day home discharge and no infusion of abciximab (group 1, n=504) or to overnight hospitalization and a standard 12-hour infusion of abciximab (group 2, n=501). The primary composite end point of the study was the 30-day incidence of any of the following events: death, myocardial infarction, urgent revascularization, major bleeding, repeat hospitalization, access site complications, and severe thrombocytopenia. The noninferiority of same-day home discharge and bolus of abciximab only compared with overnight hospitalization and abciximab bolus and infusion was evaluated. Two thirds of patients presented with unstable angina and approximately 20% presented with high-risk acute coronary syndrome prior to the procedure. The incidence of the primary end point was 20.4% in group 1 and 18.2% in group 2 (P=0.017 for noninferiority) with a troponin T-based definition of myocardial infarction; the incidence of the primary end point was 11.1% in group 1 and 9.6% in group 2 (P=0.0004 for noninferiority) with a creatinine kinase myocardial band-based definition of myocardial infarction. No death occurred. Rate of major bleeding in both groups was extremely low at 0.8% and 0.2%, respectively. From 504 patients randomized in group 1, 88% were discharged home the same day. CONCLUSIONS: Our data suggest that same-day home discharge after uncomplicated transradial coronary stenting and bolus only of abciximab is not clinically inferior, in a wide spectrum of patients, to the standard overnight hospitalization and a bolus followed by a 12-hour infusion. This novel approach offers a safe strategy for same-day home discharge after uncomplicated coronary intervention.

An experience on radial versus femoral approach for diagnostic coronary angiography in Turkey.
Authors Yigit F, Sezgin AT, Erol T, Demircan S, Tekin G, Katircibasi T, Tekin A, Muderrisoglu H.
Center

Department of Cardiology, Baskent University School of Medicine, Ankara, Turkey. yigitfatma2000@yahoo.com

Journal
Anadolu Kardiyol Derg. 2006 Sep;6(3):229-34.
Shortened abstract

OBJECTIVE: The radial approach has been increasingly used as an alternative to femoral access. The purpose of the present study was to assess the feasibility, success, and safety of the transradial approach (TRA) for diagnostic coronary angiography, and to describe the difficulties associated with the technique as compared with transfemoral approach (TRF). METHODS: A series of 180 consecutive patients were divided to TRA or TFA groups by two operators. We compared the groups regarding procedural time, access time, fluoroscopy time, procedural failure, complications, contrast volume, length of hospital stay, and number of used coronary catheters. RESULTS: The number of used coronary catheters was not different between the two groups (p = 0.6). Total hospital length of stay was significantly shorter in the radial group (p <0.0001) than in femoral one. We found differences between the radial and femoral groups in the success rate (p<0.0001), contrast volume (p = 0.012), procedural time (p<0.0001), access time (p<0.0001), and fluoroscopy time (p<0.0001). We did not find any major complication in the radial group. There was a major bleeding in the femoral group. CONCLUSION: The TRA is a safe alternative to femoral catheterization although with lesser procedural success, longer procedural access, and radiation time, and more contrast volume.

Coronary angiography and angioplasty using the aberrant radial artery as an access site.
Authors Abhaichand RK, Sambasivam KA, Vydianathan PR, Raveendran P, Saigopalan M, Gomathi S, Anil M.
Center

G. Kuppuswamy Naidu Hospital, Cardiology Department, Coimbatore, India.

Journal
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2006 Sep 19;48(6):1287
Shortened abstract

OBJECTIVE: To study the suitability of the aberrant radial artery (ARA) as an access site for coronary angiography and angioplasty. BACKGROUND: In certain situations, the radial artery operator finds that the right radial artery in its usual location is unsuitable for a transradial procedure (TRP). In such cases, the ARA should be considered as an alternate access site. METHODS: Between January 2002 and December 2004, all patients considered suitable for a TRP with a clinically absent radial artery, or a small radial artery and a palpable ARA, underwent a TRP using this vessel as an access site. We describe the technical aspects and the differences that this approach entails, in comparison to the standard radial artery approach to TRPs. RESULTS: Of the 3,610 patients considered suitable for a TRP, 22 patients underwent 29 procedures using the ARA as an access site [22 angiograms and 7 percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty procedures (PTCAs)]. The median age of the patients was 55 years, with 19 males and 3 females. All procedures using the aberrant radial artery were successful. None of the patients developed spasm or an access site complication. The mean fluoroscopy time for angiography in the right radial artery group was 4.6 minutes, and 4.8 minutes for the ARA group. The procedure timed were 24 minutes and 32 minutes, respectively. CONCLUSION: The aberrant radial artery can be used as a safe alternate access site for coronary angiography and angioplasty when the right radial artery at the usual site is not suitable.

Transradial intervention for native fistula failure.
Authors Kawarada O, Yokoi Y, Nakata S, Morioka N, Takemoto K.
Center

Department of Cardiology, Kishiwada Tokushukai Hospital, Osaka, Japan

Journal
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2006 Sep 12
Shortened abstract

The native radiocephalic (Brescia-Cimino) fistula is usually constructed with an anastomosis of the cephalic vein and radial artery. Catheter interventions for native fistula failure have until now been performed via the transcephalic or transbrachial approach. Transradial intervention for native fistula failure was prospectively evaluated for a selected consecutive 11 patients. Six patients had a single lesion and 5 patients had double lesions. Twelve lesions were stenotic and 4 were occlusive with thrombus. Balloon angioplasty alone was successful in 10 lesions. In thrombosed fistulas, 2 lesions underwent manual catheter-directed thrombo-aspiration and 2 further lesions underwent a combination of catheter-directed thrombo-aspiration and mechanical thrombectomy. Cutting Balloon angioplasty was performed for 3 resistant venous stenoses and for 1 radial artery stenosis. Technical and clinical success were achieved in all patients. No vessel rupture or perforation was observed in this study, nor was distal embolization in the radial artery or symptomatic pulmonary embolism. No radial artery occlusion or fistula infection was seen during the follow-up. The primary patency rates were 82% at 3 months and 64% at 6 months. Transradial intervention for native fistula failure is considered safe and feasible in a selected population; yet requires further validation.

Day case transradial coronary angioplasty: A four-year single-center experience.
Authors Wiper A, Kumar S, Macdonald J, Roberts DH.
Center

Blackpool Victoria Hospital, Blackpool, Lancashire, England, United Kingdom.

Journal
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2006 Sep 12
Shortened abstract

We examined the safety and feasibility of elective outpatient transradial coronary angioplasty (PCI). Four hundred and forty two patients underwent procedures over a 4-year period. Over 95% had an excellent angiographic result and 85% were discharged the same day. Radial access was successful in 417 (94%) patients. There were no major vascular complications. One patient died of a subacute stent thrombosis. Outpatient transradial PCI is safe and feasible for the majority of elective PCI cases.

Prevention of arterial spasm during percutaneous coronary interventions through radial artery: The SPASM study
Authors Varenne O, Jegou A, Cohen R, Empana JP, Salengro E, Ohanessian A, Gaultier C, Allouch P, Walspurger S, Margot O, El Hallack A, Jouven X, Weber S, Spaulding C
Center Cardiology Department, Cochin Hospital, Paris 5 School of Medicine, Rene Descartes Univeristy, Paris, France.
Journal
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2006 July 4
Shortened abstract

Aims: Radial artery spasm remains the major limitation of transradial approach for percutaneous coronary interventions. The aim of our study was to evaluate the efficacy of vasodilators in the prevention of radial artery spasm during percutaneous coronary interventions. Methods and results: 1,219 patients were consecutively randomized to receive placebo (n = 198), molsidomine 1 mg (n = 203), verapamil 2.5 mg (n = 409), 5 mg (n = 203) or verapamil 2.5 mg and molsidomine 1 mg (n = 206). All drugs were administered through the arterial sheath. The primary end point was the occurrence of a radial artery spasm defined by the operator as severe limitation of the catheter movement, with or without angiographic confirmation. Main characteristics including age, sex, wrist and arterial sheath diameters and procedure duration were identical across the groups. The rate of radial artery spasm was lowest in patients receiving verapamil and molsidomine (4.9%), compared to verapamil 2.5 mg or 5 mg (8.3 and 7.9%), or molsidomine 1 mg (13.3%); and placebo (22.2%) (P < 0.0001). Conclusion: Radial artery spasm during transradial percutaneous interventions was effectively prevented by the administration of vasodilators. The combination of verapamil 2.5 mg and molsidomine 1 mg provided the strongest relative risk reduction of spasm compared to placebo and should therefore be recommended during percutaneous coronary interventions through the radial approach.

Failure of transradial approach during coronary interventions: Anatomic considerations.
Authors Valsecchi O, Vassileva A, Musumeci G, Rossini R, Tespili M, Guagliumi G, Mihalcsik L, Gavazzi A, Ferrazzi P.
Center Interventional Cath Lab, Cardiovascular Department, Ospedali Riuniti of Bergamo, Italia.
Journal
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2006 Jun;67(6):870-8.
Shortened abstract
The anatomy of the radial artery has yet to be systematically studied from the perspective of using it as a route for catheter access. We prospectively performed angiography of the arteries of the upper limb to delineate the anatomic features of the radial artery as a way to determine the feasibility of using it as a route for coronary intervention. We studied 2,211 consecutive patients submitted to transradial cardiac catheterization. In all patients, an angiography of the upper limb arteries was performed before and after procedure. Radial puncture was successful in 98.9% of patients. At angiography, anatomic variations of upper limb arteries were noted in 505 patients (22.8%) and included tortuous configurations (3.8%), stenosis (1.7%), hypoplasias (7.7%), radioulnar loop (0.8%), abnormal origin of the radial artery (8.3%), and lusoria subclavian artery (0.45%). Overall procedural success by transradial approach was 97.5%. Patients with anatomic variations of radial artery had a significantly lower puncture (96.2% vs 99.7%, P < 0.0001) and procedural (93.1% vs 98.8%, P < 0.0001) success. The procedure was successfully performed by radial approach in 98.8% of patients with tortuous configurations, 91.9% of radial stenosis, 93.9% of hypoplastic radial artery, 83.3% of radioulnar loop, 96.7% of radial axillary origin, and 60% of lusoria subclavian artery setting. Anatomic variations of the radial artery are not rare. However, they do not represent an important limitation in transradial approach if they are well documented previously.
 
A 5Fr catheter approach reduces patient discomfort during transradial coronary intervention compared with a 6Fr approach: a prospective randomized study.
Authors Gwon HC, Doh JH, Choi JH, Lee SH, Hong KP, Park JE, Seo JD
Center Cardiac and Vascular Center, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea. hcgwon@smc.samsung.co.kr
Journal
J Interv Cardiol. 2006 Apr;19(2):141-7
Shortened abstract
Smaller guiding catheters can help reduce local complications and patient morbidity during transradial coronary intervention (TRI). This study was designed to compare the patient's morbidity, success rate, and the operator's convenience between 5-French (5Fr) and 6-French (6Fr) TRIs. This is a single-center prospective randomized study. Patients who underwent TRI, in 2003, were prospectively randomized to either 5Fr or 6Fr catheter groups (100 patients in each group). Procedure-related patient morbidity as well as clinical and procedural characteristics was scored and analyzed. Procedural success rate was not significantly different between the groups. The number of unsatisfactory supports (6% in 5Fr group, 3% in 6Fr group; P=0.31) and the incidence of local wound complications were not significantly different between the groups. Local wound pain scores were significantly lower in the 5Fr group compared with the 6Fr group, particularly during sheath insertion and removal, and during procedures. Pain scores were higher in female patients than in male patients during sheath removal (male: 1.3+/-1.3, female: 1.7+/-1.5; P=0.049). Radial artery diameter was well correlated with local pain score during sheath removal (r=0.31, P<0.001), and with the height and weight of the patients (height: r=0.33, P<0.001; weight: r=0.27, P<0.001). In conclusion, using a 5Fr catheter during TRI reduce, local access site pain, particularly in female patients with smaller body size, whereas the success and local complication rates were similar to a 6Fr approach.
 
Percutaneous left and right heart catheterization in fully anticoagulated patients utilizing the radial artery and forearm vein: a two-center experience.
Authors Lo TS, Buch AN, Hall IR, Hildick-Smith DJ, Nolan J
Center Cardiothoracic Centre, University Hospital of North Staffordshire, Stoke-on-Trent, United Kingdom.
Journal
J Interv Cardiol. 2006 Jun;19(3):258-63.
Shortened abstract
Background: Stopping oral anticoagulants prior to cardiac catheterization is associated with an increased risk of thromboembolism. Performing the procedures via the femoral artery and vein without interruption of anticoagulation is associated with a high rate of major access site complications. The transradial technique for left heart catheterization is safe in fully anticoagulated patients but few data are available on the percutaneous right and left heart catheterization utilizing a combination of the radial artery and antecubital vein in this group of patients. Methods: We report our experience in 28 consecutive patients that underwent left and right heart catheterizations via this percutaneous arm approach without interruption of anticoagulation. These were compared to 31 consecutive non-anticoagulated patients that underwent the procedure via a conventional femoral artery and vein approach. Results: Arterial and venous accesses were achieved and complete angiographic and hemodynamic data obtained in all patients. There were no access site complications in the anticoagulated patients despite an International normalized ratio (INR) of 2.5 +/- 0.5. Procedural duration was longer in the anticoagulated group of patients, but fluoroscopy time and patient radiation dose were similar in both groups. Conclusion: Our experience suggests that left and right heart catheterization can be safely performed in most fully anticoagulated patients using this technique with a low bleeding and thromboembolic risk and no increase in radiation exposure.
Nitroglycerin, nitroprusside, or both, in preventing radial artery spasm during transradial artery catheterization.
Authors Coppola J, Patel T. Kwan T, Sanghvi K, Srivastava S. Shah S, Staniloae C
Center Cardiology Research Office, Saint Vincent Catholic Medical Center, New York, New York, USA.
Journal
J Invasive Cardiol. 2006 Apr;18(4):155-8.
Shortened abstract
OBJECTIVE: Radial artery spasm remains a major complication of transradial coronary interventions. The aim of this study was to compare the efficacy of three different intra-arterial vasodilating cocktails in reducing the incidence of radial artery spasm in patients undergoing transradial coronary angiography. The secondary goal was to assess the predictors of arterial spasm in this large group of patients. METHODS: A total of 379 patients undergoing the procedure were randomly enrolled in 1 of 3 groups. Every patient in each of the 3 groups received intra-arterial heparin, lidocaine and diltiazem. Along with that, patients in Group A received nitroglycerin; patients in Group B received nitroprusside instead of nitroglycerin; and patients in Group C received both nitroglycerin and nitroprusside. A single experienced operator, blinded to the study drug, subjectively determined the presence of spasm. RESULTS: Of 379 patients, a total of 44 patients (11.6%) experienced spasm. The occurrence of spasm was similar, independent of the vasodilator cocktail used (Group A: 12.2%, Group B: 13.4%, Group C: 9.5%; p = 0.597). After multivariate analysis, the following variables were found to be independent predictors of spasm: radial artery diameter (RD)/height index (p = 0.005), RD/BSA index (p = 0.012), and sheath outer diameter (OD)/RD index (p = 0.024). CONCLUSION: In this prospective, randomized trial, the addition of a direct nitric oxide donor to nitroglycerin in an antispastic cocktail did not reduce the risk of spasm, and the use of nitroglycerin was found to be as effective as nitroprusside. Also, morphometric and mechanical factors play a significant role in predicting the occurrence of radial spasm. The sex of the patient, presence of diabetes, body surface area and smoking history appeared to play no role in predicting the occurrence of radial spasm.
 
Transitioning from heparin to bivalirudin in patients undergoing ad hoc transradial interventional procedures: a pilot study
Authors Venkatesh K, Mann T.
Center Wake Heart Center, Raleigh, North Carolina, USA.
Journal
J Invasive Cardiol. 2006 Mar;18(3):120-4.
Shortened abstract
OBJECTIVE: The present study evaluated the combined use of unfractionated heparin (UFH) and bivalirudin during ad hoc transradial interventional procedures. BACKGROUND: As a result of its proven efficacy in recent clinical trials, the direct thrombin inhibitor bivalirudin is now increasingly utilized as the anticoagulant of choice for coronary interventions. However, it is currently not packaged for diagnostic procedures. Patients undergoing ad hoc transradial procedures thus need unfractionated heparin during the diagnostic catheterization to protect against radial occlusion. It is unclear how the transition to bivalirudin should be undertaken if a subsequent intervention were performed. METHODS: A total of 117 patients underwent ad hoc transradial procedures. Fifty-one patients underwent diagnostic catheterizations receiving only 5,000 Units of UFH in divided doses: (1) Group 1H (n = 26), 2,500 U after sheath insertion and 2,500 U at conclusion; (2) Group 2H (n = 25), 1,000 U followed by 4,000 U. Sixty-six patients subsequently underwent interventions as part of the same procedure and received standard bivalirudin (B) dosing in addition to the initial UHF dose: Group 1B (n = 40), 2,500 Units of UFH plus B; Group 2B (n = 26), 1,000 Units of UFH plus B. The primary endpoint was postprocedure radial occlusion; secondary endpoints were any major adverse cardiac event (MACE) and any bleeding complication. RESULTS: One patient (1%) had postprocedure radial occlusion, but this recanalized at 1 month. There were no deaths, and urgent target lesion revascularization was not required. Non-Q wave myocardial infarction occurred in 7.5%, all in Group 1B. No bleeding complications occurred. CONCLUSIONS: The administration of bivalirudin after a reduced heparin dose in patients undergoing ad hoc transradial interventional procedures was not associated with adverse events in this small pilot study.
 
Feasibility and utility of transradial cerebral angiography: experience during the learning period.
Authors Kim JH, Park YS, Chung CG, Park KS, Chung DJ, Kim HJ.
Center Department of Diagnostic Radiology, Konyang University Hospital, Daejeon, Korea. radol@unitel.co.kr
Journal
Korean J Radiol. 2006 Jan-Mar;7(1):7-13.
Shortened abstract
OBJECTIVE: We wanted to present our experiences for performing transradial cerebral angiography during the learning period, and we also wanted to demonstrate this procedure's technical feasibility and utility in various clinical situations. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Thirty-two patients were enrolled in the study. All of them had unfavorable situations for performing transfemoral angiography, i.e., IV lines in the bilateral femoral vein, a phobia for groin puncture, decreased blood platelet counts, large hematoma or bruise, atherosclerosis in the bilateral femoral artery and the insistence of patients for choosing another procedure. After confirming the patency of the ulnar artery with a modified Allen's test and a pulse oximeter, the procedure was done using a 21-G micorpuncture set and 5-F Simon II catheters. After angiography, hemostasis was achieved with 1-2 minutes of manual compression and the subsequent application of a hospital-made wrist brace for two hours. The technical feasiblity and procedure-related immediate and delayed complications were evaluated. RESULTS: The procedure was successful in 30/32 patients (93.8%). Failure occurred in two patients; one patient had hypoplasia of the radial artery and one patient had vasospasm following multiple puncture trials for the radial artery. Transradial cerebral angiography was technically feasible without significant difficulties even though it was tried during the learning period. Pain in the forearm or arm developed in some patients during the procedures, but this was usually mild and transient. Procedure-related immediate complications included severe bruising in one patient and a small hematoma in one patient. Any clinically significant complication or delayed complication such as radial artery occlusion was not demonstrated in our series. CONCLUSION: Transradial cerebral angiography is a useful alternative for the patients who have unfavorable clinical situations or contraindications for performing transfemoral cerebral angiography. For the experienced neurointerventionalists, it seems that additional training for performing transradial cerebral angiography is not needed.
Transradial right and left heart catheterizations: a comparison to traditional femoral approach
Authors Gilchrist IC, Moyer CD, Gascho JA.
Center Penn State Heart and Vascular Institute, Hershey Medical Center, Hershey, Pennsylvania 17033-0850, USA. icg1@psu.edu
Journal
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2006 Apr;67(4):585-8.
Shortened abstract
OBJECTIVES: This study compares the transradial versus transfemoral approach to combined right- and left-heart catheterization. BACKGROUND: Central venous access from peripheral veins has been a historically useful technique. Although the need for right-heart catheterization has been considered an exclusion for transradial catheterization, we have combined a peripheral approach to the central venous system with radial arterial access which permits bilateral heart catheterization using a transradial approach. METHODS: Over an 18-month period all right-heart catheterizations done in conjunction with arterial access were reviewed. Salvage procedures, mixed site access, and biopsy procedures were excluded. Radial procedures were performed using radial artery access and a forearm vein. Femoral procedures used femoral artery/vein. Demographics, procedural information, and postprocedural complications including those requiring vascular ultrasound or transfusion were recorded and used for comparison between groups. RESULTS: Total of 175 femoral/105 radial cases done by 4 operators met criteria for comparison. Both groups had similar procedural indications and age. Procedural durations were shorter (P < .01) with radial 70 +/- 5.0 min (+/-95% CI) vs. femoral 75 +/- 5.4 min (+/-95% CI). Crossover was noted in several patients from both groups; radial procedures (n = 2) failed due to previous shoulder trauma. Femoral crossover to radial involved difficult arterial access. Complications related to access site occurred in 12 femoral and 0 radial patients. CONCLUSIONS: Using the forearm for central venous access appears safer than using the femoral vessels. Transradial catheterizations can be done in combination with forearm venous access procedures with excellent results and enhanced patient safety.
Transradial cardiac catheterization in patients with coronary bypass grafts: feasibility analysis and comparison with transfemoral approach.
Authors Sanmartin M, Cuevas D, Moxica J, Valdes M, Esparza J, Baz JA, Mantilla R, Iniguez A.
Center Unidad de Cardiologia Intervencionista, Medtec, Hospital Meixoeiro, Vigo, Spain. javier.goicolea.ruigomez@sergas.es
Journal
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2006 Apr;67(4):580-4.
Shortened abstract
The objective of this study was to analyze the feasibility and safety of transradial catheterization in patients with remote surgical cardiac revascularization. Selective catheterization of coronary bypass grafts might be more difficult and time-consuming from the radial artery as compared to the femoral route. This special patient subset has been either excluded or underrepresented in previous studies. Retrospective review was made of 304 cardiac diagnostic procedures performed from January 2001 through December 2004 in patients with coronary artery bypass grafts in a single center. Patients had to be considered eligible for both transradial and transfemoral approach to be included. Cases with double internal mammary or gastroepiploic grafts were excluded. Selection of the arterial access was individualized according to operator preferences. Among diagnostic cases, transradial access was attempted as first choice in 151 cases (left radial in 133) and transfemoral in 154. Total procedural time (41 +/- 22 vs. 40 +/- 23 min), fluoroscopy time (15 +/- 10 vs. 18 +/- 13 min), and dye volume (180 +/- 64 vs. 192 +/- 73 ml) were similar. Crossover rates were 4.0% in the transradial group and 1.3% in transfemoral (P = 0.28). Only two patients in transradial group needed transfemoral access because of failure to catheterize a bypass graft. Transradial angiography of coronary bypass grafts can be performed with similar success rates as compared with transfemoral procedures and without a significant time delay.
 
Transulnar versus transradial artery approach for coronary angioplasty: The PCVI-CUBA study.
Authors Aptecar E, Pernes JM, Chabane-Chaouch M, Bussy N, Catarino G, Shahmir A, Bougrini K, Dupouy P.
Center Pole Cardio-Vasculaire Interventionnel, Clinique Les Fontaines, Melun, France.
Journal
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2006 May;67(5):711-20.
Shortened abstract
Objectives: To compare in terms of efficacy and safety the transulnar to the transradial approach for coronary angiography and angioplasty. Background: Opposite to the transradial approach, which is now widely used in catheterization laboratories worldwide, the ulnar artery approach is rarely used for cardiac catheterization. Methods: Diagnostic coronarography, followed or not by angioplasty, was performed by transulnar or transradial approach, chosen at random. A positive (normal) direct or reverse Allen's test was required before tempting the radial or the ulnar approach, respectively. MACE were recorded till 1-month follow-up. Doppler ultrasound assessment of the forearm vessels was scheduled for all the angioplastied patients. Results: Successful access was obtained in 93.1% of patients in the ulnar group (n = 216), and in 95.5% of patients in the radial group (n = 215), P = NS. One hundred and three and 105 angioplasty procedures were performed in 94 and 95 patients in ulnar and radial group, with success in 95.2% and 96.2% of procedures in ulnar and radial group, respectively (P = NS). Freedom from MACE at 1-month follow-up was observed in 93 patients in both groups (97.8% for ulnar group and 95.8% for radial group), P = NS. Asymptomatic access site artery occlusion occurred in 5.7% of patients after transulnar and in 4.7% of patients after transradial angioplasty. A big forearm hematoma, and a little A-V fistula were observed, each in one patient, in the ulnar group. Conclusion: The transulnar approach for diagnostic and therapeutic coronary interventions is a safe and effective alternative to the transradial approach, as both techniques share a high success rate and an extremely low incidence of entry site complications. The transulnar approach has the potential to spare injury to the radial artery in anticipation of its use as a coronary bypass conduit.
Transradial unprotected left main coronary stenting supported by percutaneous Impella((R)) Recover LP 2.5 assist device.
Authors Minden HH, Lehmann H, Meyhofer J, Butter C
Center Immanuel Diakonie Group, Heart Center Brandenburg in Bernau, Department of Cardiology, Ladeburger Strasse 17, 16321, Bernau, Germany, h.minden@immanuel.de.
Journal
Clin Res Cardiol. 2006 Mar 21; [Epub ahead of print]
Shortened abstract
Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) has been increasingly applied to patients with severely depressed left ventricular function and complex coronary lesions. The availability of hemodynamic support devices offers a promising option to reduce PCI-related complications in high-risk procedures. We report the case of a 79-year-old man who suffered from unstable angina. The coronary angiogram revealed multivessel disease including a significant distal left main (LM) stenosis. Additionally, the patient had a history of chronic lymphatic leukemia with immune hemolysis. Therefore, the patient was considered to be at exceptionally high mortality risk in case of cardiac surgery. We decided to perform a percutaneous revascularization of the LM supported by the Impella((R)) Recover LP 2.5 assist device. This case report discusses the principles of indications, technique and complications of this new addition to interventional cardiolgogy.
Feasibility of transradial coronary angiography and angioplasty in Chinese patients
Authors Tse TS, Lam KK, Tsui KL, Chan CK, Leung GT, Choi MC, Ko WC, Chan KK, Li SK
Center Department of Medicine, Pamela Youde Nethersole Eastern Hospital, 3 Lok Man Road, Chai Wan, Hong Kong. tsetaksun@gmail.com
Journal
Hong Kong Med J. 2006 Apr;12(2):108-14.
Shortened abstract
OBJECTIVE: To assess the clinical applicability, efficacy, and safety of coronary angiography and angioplasty via a transradial approach in local Chinese patients. DESIGN: Prospective case series. SETTING: Regional hospital, Hong Kong. PATIENTS: All patients undergoing coronary angiography and coronary angioplasty between 1 January and 30 June 2004. INTERVENTIONS: Transradial coronary angiography and coronary angioplasty. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Feasibility, success rate, and complications. RESULTS: A total of 268 coronary angiographies (62% of all coronary angiographies) and 118 coronary angioplasties (48% of all coronary angioplasties) were performed via a transradial approach. The procedural success rate for coronary angiography was 93.7% with a mean duration of 21.8 (standard deviation, 13.5) minutes compared with 17.9 (10.0) minutes for angiography via a femoral approach. Most (99%) patients were free from any complications. Of those patients who underwent elective transradial coronary angiography in the morning, 64% were discharged on the same day. Comparison of data in the first half of the study period with those in the second half revealed a significant increase in the percentage of coronary angiographies performed via a transradial approach (from 52% to 73%, P<0.0001), and an improved procedural success rate (from 91.5% to 95.3%, P=0.1). For transradial coronary angioplasty, the procedural success rate was 98%. A total of 246 lesions (2.08 lesions per patient) were treated with no procedure-related complications. CONCLUSIONS: Transradial coronary angiography and angioplasty are feasible in a significant proportion of local Chinese patients and achieve a high success rate and low complication rate. It tends to prolong procedural duration, but improves patients' comfort and permits earlier ambulation and discharge. The procedural success rate improves with accumulating experience.
 
Failure of transradial approach during coronary interventions: Anatomic considerations.
Authors Valsecchi O, Vassileva A,